Cortical potentials in an auditory oddball task reflect individual differences in working memory capacity

被引:20
作者
Yurgil, Kate A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Golob, Edward J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] VA Ctr Excellence Stress & Mental Hlth, San Diego, CA USA
[2] VA San Diego Healthcare Syst, San Diego, CA USA
[3] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Program Neurosci, New Orleans, LA 70118 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Attention; N100; P300; P3a; Perceptual load; EEG; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; DIVIDED ATTENTION; EVOKED-POTENTIALS; NEURAL MECHANISMS; P300; COMPONENT; ERP COMPONENTS; TARGET DETECTION; P3A; SPAN;
D O I
10.1111/psyp.12140
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
This study determined whether auditory cortical responses associated with mechanisms of attention vary with individual differences in working memory capacity (WMC) and perceptual load. The operation span test defined subjects with low versus high WMC, who then discriminated target/nontarget tones while EEG was recorded. Infrequent white noise distracters were presented at midline or +/- 90 degrees locations, and perceptual load was manipulated by varying nontarget frequency. Amplitude of the N100 to distracters was negatively correlated with WMC. Relative to targets, only high WMC subjects showed attenuated N100 amplitudes to nontargets. In the higher WMC group, increased perceptual load was associated with decreased P3a amplitudes to distracters and longer-lasting negative slow wave to nontargets. Results show that auditory cortical processing is associated with multiple facets of attention related to WMC and possibly higher-level cognition.
引用
收藏
页码:1263 / 1274
页数:12
相关论文
共 112 条
[1]   INTERMODAL SELECTIVE ATTENTION .2. EFFECTS OF ATTENTIONAL LOAD ON PROCESSING OF AUDITORY AND VISUAL-STIMULI IN CENTRAL SPACE [J].
ALHO, K ;
WOODS, DL ;
ALGAZI, A ;
NAATANEN, R .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1992, 82 (05) :356-368
[2]   The emergence of Cognitive Hearing Science [J].
Arlinger, Stig ;
Lunner, Thomas ;
Lyxell, Bjorn ;
Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2009, 50 (05) :371-384
[3]   Electrophysiological correlates of categorization: P300 amplitude as index of target similarity [J].
Azizian, A ;
Freitas, AL ;
Watson, TD ;
Squires, NK .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 71 (03) :278-288
[4]   Working memory [J].
Baddeley, Alan .
CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2010, 20 (04) :R136-R140
[5]   Prefrontal modulation of visual processing in humans [J].
Barceló, F ;
Suwazono, S ;
Knight, RT .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (04) :399-403
[6]   When high-powered people fail - Working memory and "choking under pressure'' in math [J].
Beilock, SL ;
Carr, TH .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 16 (02) :101-105
[7]   The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework [J].
Braver, Todd S. .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2012, 16 (02) :106-113
[8]   Putting things into perspective - Individual differences in working-memory span and the integration of information [J].
Brumback, CR ;
Low, KA ;
Gratton, G ;
Fabiani, M .
EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2005, 52 (01) :21-30
[9]   Sensory ERPs predict differences in working memory span and fluid intelligence [J].
Brumback, CR ;
Low, KA ;
Gratton, G ;
Fabiani, M .
NEUROREPORT, 2004, 15 (02) :373-376
[10]   Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control? [J].
Cohen, JD ;
Botvinick, M ;
Carter, CS .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 3 (05) :421-423