Analytic modeling of axisymmetric disruption halo currents

被引:65
作者
Humphreys, DA [1 ]
Kellman, AG [1 ]
机构
[1] Gen Atom Co, San Diego, CA 92186 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.873231
中图分类号
O35 [流体力学]; O53 [等离子体物理学];
学科分类号
070204 ; 080103 ; 080704 ;
摘要
Currents which can flow in plasma facing components during disruptions pose a challenge to the design of next generation tokamaks. Induced toroidal eddy currents and both induced and conducted poloidal "halo" currents can produce design-limiting electromagnetic loads. While induction of toroidal and poloidal currents in passive structures is a well-understood phenomenon, the driving terms and scalings for poloidal currents flowing on open field lines during disruptions are less well established. A model of halo current evolution is presented in which the current is induced in the halo by decay of the plasma current and change in enclosed toroidal flux while being convected into the halo from the core by plasma motion. Fundamental physical processes and scalings are described in a simplified analytic version of the model. The peak axisymmetric halo current is found to depend on halo and core plasma characteristics during the current quench, including machine and plasma dimensions, resistivities, safety factor, and vertical stability growth rate. Two extreme regimes in poloidal halo current amplitude are identified depending on the minimum halo safety factor reached during the disruption. A "type I" disruption is characterized by a minimum safety factor that remains relatively high (typically 2-3, comparable to the predisruption safety factor), and a relatively low poloidal halo current. A "type II" disruption is characterized by a minimum safety factor comparable to unity and a relatively high poloidal halo current. Model predictions for these two regimes are found to agree well with halo current measurements from vertical displacement event disruptions in DIII-D [T. S. Taylor, K. H. Burrell, D. R. Baker, G. L. Jackson, R. J. La Haye, M. A. Mahdavi, R. Prater, T. C. Simonen, and A. D. Turnbull, "Results from the DIII-D Scientific Research Program," in Proceedings of the 17th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Yokohama, 1998, to be published in a Special Edition of Nuclear Fusion (1999)]. (C) 1999 American Institute of Physics. [S0556-2821(99)02407-8].
引用
收藏
页码:2742 / 2756
页数:15
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
Andrew P, 1995, SOFE '95 - 16TH IEEE/NPSS SYMPOSIUM ON FUSION ENGINEERING, VOLS 1 AND 2, P770, DOI 10.1109/FUSION.1995.535948
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1986, NUMERICAL RECIPES C
[3]   Measurements of non-axisymmetric halo currents with and without 'killer' pellets during disruptions in the DIII-D tokamak [J].
Evans, TE ;
Kellman, AG ;
Humphreys, DA ;
Schaffer, MJ ;
Taylor, PL ;
Whyte, DG ;
Jernigan, TC ;
Hyatt, AW ;
Lee, RL .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS, 1997, 241 :606-611
[4]   Disruptions and halo currents in Alcator C-Mod [J].
Granetz, RS ;
Hutchinson, IH ;
Sorci, J ;
Irby, JH ;
LaBombard, B ;
Gwinn, D .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1996, 36 (05) :545-556
[5]  
GRANETZ RS, 1997, P 16 IAEA FUS EN C M, V1, P757
[6]   VERTICAL DISPLACEMENT EVENTS AND HALO CURRENTS [J].
GRUBER, O ;
LACKNER, K ;
PAUTASSO, G ;
SEIDEL, U ;
STREIBL, B .
PLASMA PHYSICS AND CONTROLLED FUSION, 1993, 35 :B191-B204
[7]   FAST IDENTIFICATION OF PLASMA BOUNDARY AND X-POINTS IN ELONGATED TOKAMAKS [J].
HOFMANN, F ;
TONETTI, G .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1988, 28 (03) :519-522
[8]   COLD BUBBLE FORMATION DURING TOKAMAK DENSITY LIMIT DISRUPTIONS [J].
HOWARD, J ;
PERSSON, M .
NUCLEAR FUSION, 1992, 32 (03) :361-377
[9]  
HUMPHREYS DA, UNPUB PHYS PLASMAS
[10]   DYNAMIC MODELING OF TRANSPORT AND POSITIONAL CONTROL OF TOKAMAKS [J].
JARDIN, SC ;
POMPHREY, N ;
DELUCIA, J .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 1986, 66 (02) :481-507