Is 2-mm Punch Biopsy Useful in the Diagnosis of Malignant Eyelid Tumors?

被引:6
作者
Carneiro, Rachel Camargo [2 ]
Santiago de Macedo, Erick Marcet [2 ]
de Lima, Patricia Picciarelli [1 ]
Bonatti, Rodolfo
Matayoshi, Suzana [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Ocular Plast Surg Ctr, Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
D O I
10.1097/IOP.0b013e31825a65b4
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose: Two-millimeter punch biopsy is a swift and practical diagnostic tool in the outpatient setting. However, few studies have evaluated the efficacy of the method for diagnosis of malignant eyelid tumors. Methods: This was an observational study of patients with suspicion of malignant eyelid tumor attending the Ocular Plastic Surgery Center at Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine. Following standard procedures, preoperative biopsies were taken with a 2-mm trephine and surgical excision was performed with safety margins, followed by reconstruction. Anatomopathologic analysis of the surgical specimen was used as gold standard to evaluate the accuracy of diagnosis by punch biopsy. Results: The study included 50 periocular tumors with suspicion of malignancy. The indicators of efficacy in the identification of malignancy by 2-mm punch biopsy were: sensitivity 88%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value 100%, and negative predictive value 64%. Accuracy was 90% for malignancy and 80% for histologic type. The. index of agreement between the diagnostic methods was 0.722 (p < 0.001). Conclusion: A positive result with 2-mm punch biopsy is a safe indication for surgical excision of the tumor, whereas a negative result does not necessarily imply benignity. In cases of high clinical suspicion, a second biopsy should be taken from a different part of the tumor to rule out malignancy. (Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2012;28:282-285)
引用
收藏
页码:282 / 285
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Management of malignant and benign eyelid lesions [J].
Bernardini, Francesco P. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2006, 17 (05) :480-484
[2]  
Chatterjee Sudeshna, 2004, Orbit, V23, P87, DOI 10.1080/01676830490501497
[3]  
Deprez M, 2009, AM J DERMATOPATH, V31, P256, DOI 10.1097/DAD.0b013e3181961861
[4]   THE VALIDITY AND PRACTICALITY OF SUN-REACTIVE SKIN TYPE-I THROUGH TYPE-VI [J].
FITZPATRICK, TB .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGY, 1988, 124 (06) :869-871
[5]  
Hillson TR, 1998, CAN J OPHTHALMOL, V33, P377
[6]  
Kersten RC, 1998, OPHTHALMOLOGY, V10, P203
[7]  
KLEINSTEIN RN, 1977, AM J OPTOM PHYS OPT, V54, P49
[8]   Eyelid tumors: Accuracy of clinical diagnosis [J].
Margo, CE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1999, 128 (05) :635-636
[9]   Efficacy of incisional vs punch biopsy in the histological diagnosis of periocular skin tumours [J].
Rice, JC ;
Zaragoza, P ;
Waheed, K ;
Schofield, J ;
Jones, CA .
EYE, 2003, 17 (04) :478-481
[10]   Evaluation of the 2-mm punch biopsy in dermatological diagnosis [J].
Todd, P ;
Garioch, JJ ;
Humphreys, S ;
Seywright, M ;
Thomson, J ;
duVivier, AWP .
CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL DERMATOLOGY, 1996, 21 (01) :11-13