Rod ejection accident analysis for AP1000 with MOX/UOX mixed core loading

被引:5
作者
Selim, Hala K. [1 ]
Amin, Esmat H. [1 ]
Roushdy, Hassan E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Nucl & Radiol Regulatory Author, Dept Nucl Safety Engn, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Engn Phys Dept, Fac Engn, Giza, Egypt
关键词
AP1000; Reactor safety; Reactivity Initiated Accident; Rod ejection accident; UO2/MOX; QUARK;
D O I
10.1016/j.anucene.2017.05.029
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
One RIA accident, control rod ejection is a design basis accident for LWRs. Hence, it is a postulated event of very low probability, which would have serious consequences if not inherently accounted for in the design of the reactor and the safety systems. In accordance to the regulatory requirement the accident should be analyzed for nuclear reactors. The Westinghouse AP1000 Advanced Passive pressurized water reactor is designed to achieve high safety and performance. Initial core loading of the reactor has three types of UO2 fuel assemblies with the U235 enrichments namely: 2.35 w/o, 3.40 w/o and 4.45 w/o. In this paper, an alternative core loading is presented in which one-third fuel assemblies is replaced with MOX. The safety performance of the AP1000 during a reactivity insertion accident is investigated by modeling the reactor for the two core loading patterns using QUARK code. QUARK is a 3D neutronic kinetics calculations coupled to core thermal hydraulics code. The required cross-section data for QUARK have been generated using WIMSD5. The aim of the research is to give insights into the UO2 and MOX fuel behavior during the rod ejection transient. The results of the analysis show that no fuels failure occurs under the transient. The overall performance of UO2/MOX core loading has proved to be similar to that of UO2 core loading with slightly positive effect on the enthalpy and the fuel temperature; the utilization of MOX fuel remains as good as that of UO2. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:385 / 395
页数:11
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]  
Barrachina T., 2010, P 1 INT NUCL REN EN
[2]  
Hegyi Gyorgy, 2010, PROGR NUCL ENERGY
[3]  
IAEA TR 415, 2003, 415 IAEA TR
[4]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2002, INT AT EN AG SAF REP, V23
[5]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2003, IAEA SAF REP SER, V30
[6]  
International Atomic Energy Agency, 2011, 81 INT AT EN AG
[7]  
Kim Yong Deog, 2013, REACTIVITY INITIATED
[8]  
Lee Chang-Ho, 2002, ANAL CONTROL ROD EJE
[9]  
Nuclear Energy Agency, 2006, VER HIGH BURN UPS LI
[10]  
Radiation Safety Information Computational Center, 1991, WIMS D5 WINFR IMPR M