The Premises and Promises of Trolls in Norwegian Biodiversity Preservation On the Boundaries Between Bureaucracy and Science

被引:7
作者
Bay-Larsen, Ingrid [1 ]
机构
[1] Nordland Res Inst, N-8049 Bodo, Norway
关键词
Biodiversity; Post normal sciences; Boundary work; Legitimacy; Environmental administration; Metaphors; ENVIRONMENTAL-POLICY; CONSERVATION; UNCERTAINTY; INTERFACE; WASTE; TRUST;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-012-9837-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper examines the perception and implementation of scientific knowledge among Norwegian environmental bureaucrats in the process of preserving biodiversity. Based on interviews with environmental officials and scientists, and document studies, the data reveal a mismatch between the ideal administrative world presented by environmental managers, and the empirical reality of biodiversity vulnerability and preservation. The environmental officials depict a process where their mandate is merely instrumental, where science provides objective descriptions of biodiversity value, and where the spheres of science, policy and administration are strictly separated. Instead of a transparent strategy for handling scientific ambiguities inherent in biodiversity value assessments (such as complexity and uncertainty), and administrative judgments, the paper argues that these boundary objects and areas are perceived as 'trolls' that are ignored and hidden by environmental officials. This strategy appears intuitive and guided by a linear decision making paradigm where boundary objects are considered illegitimate. As a solution to possible obstacles stemming from this institutional vacuum, the article finally discusses the potential of adapting or assimilating the trolls to better meet the challenges of biodiversity preservation. A viable first step might be cross-disciplinary characterisation of complexities and uncertainties of biodiversity assessments. This might help to articulate the binary ontology of value assessments and to better address the critical administrative, political and scientific intersections. These boundary areas must be re-institutionalised by environmental agencies, and cognizant strategies must be devised and implemented for making professional judgment and discretion. Finally, it may amount to a more honest stance on conservation, where the inherent complexities to biodiversity preservation may be managed as complexities, and not as trolls.
引用
收藏
页码:942 / 953
页数:12
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Interfaces Between Science and Society, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.ENVS0FT.2007.02.004
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, IUCN Red List of Threatened Species
[3]  
Asdal K, 1999, TEKNOLOGI VIENTSKAP
[4]   The conservationists' concerns: on national administration response to integrated use and protection planning [J].
Bay-Larsen, Ingrid .
LOCAL ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 15 (04) :357-371
[5]   Reconstructing boundaries and reason in the climate debate [J].
Berkhout, Frans .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (04) :565-569
[6]  
Biermann F, 2000, SCI POWER INT ENV NE
[7]  
Bowker Geoffrey C., 1999, Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences
[8]   Innovations for conservation and development [J].
Brown, K .
GEOGRAPHICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 168 :6-17
[9]   The scientific underpinning of policy [J].
Brundtland, GH .
SCIENCE, 1997, 277 (5325) :457-457
[10]   Conserving nature, but to what end? Conservation policies and the unanticipated ecologies they support [J].
Carolan, Michael S. .
ORGANIZATION & ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 19 (02) :153-170