Factors Influencing Hackathon Adoption for Learning Information Technology (IT) Programming Modules

被引:2
作者
Oyetade, Kayode Emmanuel [1 ]
Zuva, Tranos [1 ]
Harmse, Anneke [1 ]
机构
[1] Vaal Univ Technol, Dept ICT, Vaal, South Africa
来源
TEM JOURNAL-TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION MANAGEMENT INFORMATICS | 2022年 / 11卷 / 03期
关键词
hackathon; higher education; information technology; computer programmin; USER ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.18421/TEM113-22
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Hackathon as a social event has been identified as a method that assists participants collaborate and solve technical design challenges in a limited time. With the numerous hackathon potentials, its significance in computer and IT programming courses have not been fully explored for teaching and learning. The hackathon concept has been in existence for some times, and research on the adoption of hackathon has been limited to the industry but not much in education. This paper endeavours to investigate the factors that influence hackathon adoption in the academic sector particularly in higher education. Quantitative research was undertaken; a survey was administered to a sample of 249 South African IT programming students. The results indicate that relative advantage (beta = 0.142, rho = 0.045), perceived usefulness (beta = 0.205, rho = 0.036), performance expectancy (beta = 0.205, rho = 0.002) and self-efficacy (beta = 0.330, rho = 0.000) have a positive influence on the behavioural intention of students to adopt hackathon for learning IT programming. The hackathon adoption model was developed for higher education. This research helps in the adoption of hackathons in higher education.
引用
收藏
页码:1165 / 1171
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   An Examination of the Prior Use of E-Learning Within an Extended Technology Acceptance Model and the Factors That Influence the Behavioral Intention of Users to Use M-Learning [J].
Abramson, Jonathan ;
Dawson, Maurice ;
Stevens, Jeffery .
SAGE OPEN, 2015, 5 (04)
[2]   THE THEORY OF PLANNED BEHAVIOR [J].
AJZEN, I .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (02) :179-211
[3]  
Alshammari SH., 2020, Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal (ITLJ), V4, P12
[4]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[5]  
Blunch N., 2012, INTRO STRUCTURAL EQU, VSecond
[6]  
Briscoe G.C. Mulligan., 2014, Digital innovation: The hackathon phenomenon
[7]  
Butler M., 2007, P ASCILITE AUSTR SOC, P99
[8]  
Calco M., 2015, Marketing Educ. Rev., V25, P33, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1080/10528008.2015.999600, DOI 10.1080/10528008.2015.999600, 10.1080/10528008.2015.999600]
[9]  
Chen GD, 2012, EDUC TECHNOL SOC, V15, P62