The "right kind of telling": knowledge building in the academic design studio

被引:36
作者
Cennamo, Katherine [1 ]
Brandt, Carol [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Tech, Dept Learning Sci & Technol, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[2] Temple Univ, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2012年 / 60卷 / 05期
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Studio-based learning; Design knowledge; Qualitative research; Critique;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-012-9254-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Studio-based instruction, as traditionally enacted in design disciplines such as architecture, product design, graphic design, and the like, consists of dedicated desk space for each student, extended time blocks allocated to studio classes, and classroom interactions characterized by independent and group work on design problems supplemented by frequent public and individual critiques. Although the surface features and pedagogy of the studio have been well-documented, relatively little attention has been paid to student and teacher participation structures through which design knowledge is co-produced among instructors and students within the studio. The purpose of this study was to investigate the nature of faculty-student interactions through which students learn to think and act as designers. To that end, we have collected and analyzed ethnographic data from five studio classrooms across three design disciplines (architecture, industrial design, and human-computer interaction). Our findings provide insight as to the ways that dialogue-the "right kind of telling"aEuro"and particular social practices in the studio support students as they learn to solve ill-structured design problems while being simultaneously inducted into practices that reflect the professional world of their discipline. In each of the studio classrooms, the instructors were able to create an environment where students and faculty practiced reflection-in-action and listening-in as a form of intentional participation, design knowledge was conveyed through modeling and meta-discussions, and focused assignments and in-progress critiques enhanced opportunities for the individual and group processes through which design knowledge was co-constructed in these studio classrooms.
引用
收藏
页码:839 / 858
页数:20
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Comput. Sci. Educ., DOI DOI 10.1076/CSED.13.3.191.14945
[2]  
Anthony K.H., 1987, Journal of Architectural Education, V40, P2
[3]  
Arvola M, 2008, NORD J DIGIT LIT, V3, P78
[4]  
Barab S., 2006, EDUC RESEARCHER, V35, P3, DOI DOI 10.3102/0013189X035005003
[5]  
Barab SA, 2000, THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS OF LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, P25
[6]   Ecologies of participation in school classrooms [J].
Boylan, Mark .
TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION, 2010, 26 (01) :61-70
[7]   A theoretical framework for the studio as a learning environment [J].
Brandt, Carol B. ;
Cennamo, Katherine ;
Douglas, Sarah ;
Vernon, Mitzi ;
McGrath, Margarita ;
Reimer, Yolanda .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND DESIGN EDUCATION, 2013, 23 (02) :329-348
[8]   Studio Based Learning: Proposing, Critiquing, Iterating Our Way to Person-Centeredness for Better Classroom Management [J].
Brocato, Kay .
THEORY INTO PRACTICE, 2009, 48 (02) :138-+
[9]   The Studio experience at the University of Georgia: an example of constructionist learning for adults [J].
Clinton, Gregory ;
Rieber, Lloyd P. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2010, 58 (06) :755-780
[10]  
Cossentino Jacqueline., 2002, RE ECTIVE PRACTICE I, V3, P39, DOI [10.1080/14623940220129861, DOI 10.1080/14623940220129861]