Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English

被引:87
作者
Francis, Alexander L. [1 ,2 ]
Kaganovich, Natalya [1 ,2 ]
Driscoll-Huber, Courtney [1 ]
机构
[1] Purdue Univ, Dept Speech Language & Hearing Sci, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, Program Linguist, W Lafayette, IN 47906 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.2945161
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
In English, voiced and voiceless syllable-initial stop consonants differ in both fundamental frequency at the onset of voicing (onset F0) and voice onset time (VOT). Although both correlates, alone, can cue the voicing contrast, listeners weight VOT more heavily when both are available. Such differential weighting may arise from differences in the perceptual distance between voicing categories along the VOT versus onset F0 dimensions, or it may arise from a bias to pay more attention to VOT than to onset F0. The present experiment examines listeners' use of these two cues when classifying stimuli in which perceptual distance was artificially equated along the two dimensions. Listeners were also trained to categorize stimuli based on one cue at the expense of another. Equating perceptual distance eliminated the expected bias toward VOT before training, but successfully learning to base decisions more on VOT and less on onset F0 was easier than vice versa. Perceptual distance along both dimensions increased for both groups after training, but only VOT-trained listeners showed a decrease in Garner interference. Results lend qualified support to an attentional model of phonetic learning in which learning involves strategic redeployment of selective attention across integral acoustic cues. (C) 2008 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:1234 / 1251
页数:18
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Abramson A.S., 1970, P 6 INT C PHON SCI P, P569
[2]   LARYNGEAL TIMING IN CONSONANT DISTINCTIONS [J].
ABRAMSON, AS .
PHONETICA, 1977, 34 (04) :295-303
[3]  
ABRAMSON AS, 1985, LINGUISTIC PHONETICS, P25
[4]   Neural representation of consciously imperceptible speech sound differences [J].
Allen, J ;
Kraus, N ;
Bradlow, A .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2000, 62 (07) :1383-1393
[5]  
[Anonymous], DEV SPEECH PERCEPTIO
[6]  
[Anonymous], J ACOUSTICAL SOC AM, DOI DOI 10.1121/1.4787743
[7]  
[Anonymous], NEURON, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00897-8, DOI 10.1016/S0896-6273(00)00145-8]
[8]   A RESPONSE-TIME THEORY OF SEPARABILITY AND INTEGRALITY IN SPEEDED CLASSIFICATION [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
MADDOX, WT .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1994, 38 (04) :423-466
[9]   VARIETIES OF PERCEPTUAL INDEPENDENCE [J].
ASHBY, FG ;
TOWNSEND, JT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1986, 93 (02) :154-179
[10]  
Boersma P., 2006, Praat: Doing phonetics by computer