Seminal hyperviscosity is associated with poor outcome of controlled ovarian stimulation and intrauterine insemination: A prospective study

被引:0
作者
Esfandiari, N [1 ]
Gotlieb, L [1 ]
Casper, RF [1 ]
机构
[1] Toronto Ctr Adv Reprod Technol, IVF & Androl Clin & Res Labs, Toronto, ON M5S 2X9, Canada
关键词
infertility; seminal hyperviscosity; intrauterine insemination; pregnancy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective-To determine the relationship between seminal hyperviscosity and pregnancy outcome in patients undergoing ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination (IUI). Methods-Patients were enrolled in the study between October 2002 and December 2003 at the Toronto Centre for Advanced Reproductive Technology. This was a prospective trial that included 37 infertile couples with abnormal seminal viscosity who underwent 57 insemination cycles as treatment for infertility (group I) and 37 couples undergoing 51 IUI cycles during the same time period, with normal semen viscosity, who served as controls (group II). Cycles were stimulated using either gonadotropin (FSH) only or FSH combined with an aromatase inhibitor, and raw semen processed for intrauterine insemination using swim-up or density gradient. Results-The mean number (+/- SD) of IUI cycles was 1.93 +/- 1.42 per patient (range 1 to 7 cycles) in group I and 2.4 +/- 1.05 (range 1 to 4) in group II. The overall pregnancy rate (PR) was 14 % (8/57) and 11.8 % (6/51) per cycle, and 21.6% (8/37) and 16.2% (6/37) per patient in group I and in group II, respectively. Among patients where the male had seminal hyperviscosity, five (62.5%) pregnancies miscarried in the first trimester; there was no miscarriage in the control group. Conclusion: The high miscarriage rate in couples with semen hyperviscosity may be attributed to biophysical alterations or chemical changes of the ejaculate that could impact sperm quality despite normal sperm parameters on semen analysis.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 27
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Flexible versus rigid intrauterine insemination catheters: A prospective, randomized, controlled study
    Miller, PB
    Acres, ML
    Proctor, JG
    Higdon, HL
    Boone, WR
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2005, 83 (05) : 1544 - 1546
  • [42] Preconception Steroid Treatment in Infertile Women with Antithyroid Autoimmunity Undergoing Ovarian Stimulation and Intrauterine Insemination: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Prospective Cohort Study
    Turi, Angelo
    Giannubilo, Stefano Raffaele
    Zanconi, Sara
    Mascetti, Alessandra
    Tranquili, Andrea Luigi
    CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2010, 32 (14) : 2415 - 2421
  • [43] Pretreatment antimiillenan hormone levels and outcomes of ovarian stimulation with gonadotropins/intrauterine insemination cycles
    Vagios, Stylianos
    Hsu, Jennifer Y.
    Sacha, Caitlin R.
    Dimitriadis, Irene
    Christou, Georgios
    James, Kaitlyn E.
    Bormann, Charles L.
    Souter, Irene
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 116 (02) : 422 - 430
  • [44] Abnormal sperm morphology is highly predictive of pregnancy outcome during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intrauterine insemination
    Lindheim, SR
    Barad, DH
    Zinger, M
    Witt, B
    Amin, H
    Cohen, B
    Fisch, H
    Barg, P
    JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1996, 13 (07) : 569 - 572
  • [45] A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED TRIAL COMPARING 2 DIFFERENT INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION REGIMENS IN CONTROLLED OVARIAN HYPERSTIMULATION CYCLES
    SILVERBERG, KM
    JOHNSON, JV
    OLIVE, DL
    BURNS, WN
    SCHENKEN, RS
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1992, 57 (02) : 357 - 361
  • [46] Prediction of over-response to ovarian stimulation in an intrauterine insemination programme
    Lashen, H
    Afnan, M
    McDougall, L
    Clark, P
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (11) : 2751 - 2754
  • [47] Recurrent Endometrioma in Infertile Patients Has Worse Outcome than Primary Endometrioma in Response to Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation and Intrauterine Insemination
    Huseyin, Kiyak
    Tolga, Karacan
    Berk, Bulut
    Eser, Ozyurek
    Ali, Gedikbasi
    Murat, Api
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE, 2019, 64 (7-8) : 282 - 290
  • [48] α-glycosidase activity in seminal plasma:: predictive value for outcome in intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization
    Spiessens, C
    D'Hooghe, T
    Wouters, E
    Meuleman, C
    Vanderschueren, D
    FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1998, 69 (04) : 735 - 739
  • [49] Single versus Double Intrauterine Insemination in Controlled Ovarian Hyperstimulation Cycles: A Randomized Trial
    Sorouri, Ziba Zahiri
    Shomali, Romina Rashid
    Pourmarzi, Davoud
    ARCHIVES OF IRANIAN MEDICINE, 2016, 19 (07) : 465 - 469
  • [50] The outcomes of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation/intrauterine insemination in patients with unilateral tubal occlusion on hysterosalpingograph
    Selcuk, Selcuk
    Kucukbas, Mehmet
    Yenidede, Ilter
    Eser, Semra Kayatas
    Eser, Ahmet
    Cam, Cetin
    Kutlu, Huseyin Tayfun
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 13 (01) : 7 - 10