Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants

被引:106
|
作者
Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina [1 ]
Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha [1 ]
Britto Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo [1 ]
Calasans-Maia, Jose [2 ]
Granjeiro, Jose Mauro [3 ,4 ]
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Grad Program Dent, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dept Orthodont, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Metrol Qual & Technol, Duque De Caxias, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Sch Dent, Dent Clin Res Ctr, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Dental implants; Surface properties; Wettability; Osseointegration; Rabbits; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION; BONE APPOSITION; TITANIUM; INTEGRATION; ADSORPTION; BEHAVIOR; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1590/1678-775720140483
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of two different commercially available dental implants on osseointegration. The surfaces were: sandblasting and acid etching (Group 1) and sandblasting and acid etching, then maintained in an isotonic solution of 0.9% sodium chloride (Group 2). Material and Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed for surface chemistry analysis. Surface morphology and topography was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy (CM), respectively. Contact angle analysis (CAA) was employed for wetting evaluation. Bone-implant-contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) analysis were performed on thin sections (30 mu m) 14 and 28 days after the installation of 10 implants from each group (n=20) in rabbits' tibias. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA at the 95% level of significance considering implantation time and implant surface as independent variables. Results: Group 2 showed 3-fold less carbon on the surface and a markedly enhanced hydrophilicity compared to Group 1 but a similar surface roughness (p>0.05). BIC and BAFO levels in Group 2 at 14 days were similar to those in Group 1 at 28 days. After 28 days of installation, BIC and BAFO measurements of Group 2 were approximately 1.5-fold greater than in Group 1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The surface chemistry and wettability implants of Group 2 accelerate osseointegration and increase the area of the bone-to-implant interface when compared to those of Group 1.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 287
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Visualization of osseointegration of maxilla and mandible dental implants
    Meyer, Joerg
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2010, 5 (01) : 69 - 76
  • [22] Visualization of osseointegration of maxilla and mandible dental implants
    Joerg Meyer
    International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery, 2010, 5 : 69 - 76
  • [23] The Influence of Systemic Medications on Osseointegration of Dental Implants
    Ouanounou, Aviv
    Hassanpour, Siavash
    Glogauer, Michael
    JOURNAL OF THE CANADIAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2016, 82
  • [24] The influence of genetic polymorphisms on osseointegration of dental implants
    Kloss-Brandstaetter, Anita
    Kloss, Frank R.
    IMPLANTOLOGIE, 2011, 19 (01): : 17 - 25
  • [25] Osseointegration of dental implants in patients with and without radiotherapy
    Wagner, Wolfgang
    Esser, Elmar
    Ostkamp, Klaus
    Acta Oncologica, 37 (7-8): : 693 - 696
  • [26] GEOMETRICAL OPTIMIZATION OF DENTAL IMPLANTS WITH REGARD TO OSSEOINTEGRATION
    Rehounek, Lubos
    Denk, Frantisek
    Jira, Ales
    NMM 2017 - NANO & MACRO MECHANICS 2017, 2017, 13 : 97 - 101
  • [27] The roles of surface chemistry and topography in the strength and rate of osseointegration of titanium implants in bone
    Sul, Young-Taeg
    Kang, Byung-Soo
    Johansson, Carina
    Um, Heung-Sik
    Park, Chan-Jin
    Albrektsson, Tomas
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART A, 2009, 89A (04) : 942 - 950
  • [28] Contemporary Concepts in Osseointegration of Dental Implants: A Review
    Pandey, Chandrashekhar
    Rokaya, Dinesh
    Bhattarai, Bishwa Prakash
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2022, 2022
  • [29] Effects of selected factors on the osseointegration of dental implants
    Koszuta, Piotr
    Grafka, Agnieszka
    Koszuta, Agnieszka
    Lopucki, Maciej
    Szymanska, Jolanta
    MENOPAUSE REVIEW-PRZEGLAD MENOPAUZALNY, 2015, 14 (03): : 184 - 187
  • [30] Significance of primary stability for osseointegration of dental implants
    Lioubavina-Hack, N
    Lang, NP
    Karring, T
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2006, 17 (03) : 244 - 250