Early osseointegration driven by the surface chemistry and wettability of dental implants

被引:106
|
作者
Sartoretto, Suelen Cristina [1 ]
Neves Novellino Alves, Adriana Terezinha [1 ]
Britto Resende, Rodrigo Figueiredo [1 ]
Calasans-Maia, Jose [2 ]
Granjeiro, Jose Mauro [3 ,4 ]
Calasans-Maia, Monica Diuana [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Fluminense, Grad Program Dent, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Fluminense, Dept Orthodont, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
[3] Natl Inst Metrol Qual & Technol, Duque De Caxias, RJ, Brazil
[4] Univ Fed Fluminense, Sch Dent, Dent Clin Res Ctr, Niteroi, RJ, Brazil
关键词
Dental implants; Surface properties; Wettability; Osseointegration; Rabbits; HISTOMORPHOMETRIC EVALUATION; BONE APPOSITION; TITANIUM; INTEGRATION; ADSORPTION; BEHAVIOR; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1590/1678-775720140483
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: The objective of this study was to investigate the impact of two different commercially available dental implants on osseointegration. The surfaces were: sandblasting and acid etching (Group 1) and sandblasting and acid etching, then maintained in an isotonic solution of 0.9% sodium chloride (Group 2). Material and Methods: X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was employed for surface chemistry analysis. Surface morphology and topography was investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal microscopy (CM), respectively. Contact angle analysis (CAA) was employed for wetting evaluation. Bone-implant-contact (BIC) and bone area fraction occupied (BAFO) analysis were performed on thin sections (30 mu m) 14 and 28 days after the installation of 10 implants from each group (n=20) in rabbits' tibias. Statistical analysis was performed by ANOVA at the 95% level of significance considering implantation time and implant surface as independent variables. Results: Group 2 showed 3-fold less carbon on the surface and a markedly enhanced hydrophilicity compared to Group 1 but a similar surface roughness (p>0.05). BIC and BAFO levels in Group 2 at 14 days were similar to those in Group 1 at 28 days. After 28 days of installation, BIC and BAFO measurements of Group 2 were approximately 1.5-fold greater than in Group 1 (p<0.05). Conclusion: The surface chemistry and wettability implants of Group 2 accelerate osseointegration and increase the area of the bone-to-implant interface when compared to those of Group 1.
引用
收藏
页码:279 / 287
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The early osseointegration of the laser-treated and acid-etched dental implants surface: an experimental study in rabbits
    Rong, Mingdeng
    Zhou, Lei
    Gou, Zehong
    Zhu, Andi
    Zhou, Dongfeng
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS SCIENCE-MATERIALS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 20 (08) : 1721 - 1728
  • [12] Strain driven fast osseointegration of implants
    Ulrich Joos
    Andre Büchter
    Hans-Peter Wiesmann
    Ulrich Meyer
    Head & Face Medicine, 1 (1)
  • [13] The effect of cigarette smoking on early osseointegration of dental implants: a prospective controlled study
    Bezerra Ferreira, Jose Divino
    Rodrigues, Jose Augusto
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
    Shibli, Jamil Awad
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2016, 27 (09) : 1123 - 1128
  • [14] Effect of surface contamination on osseointegration of dental implants surrounded by circumferential bone defects
    Mohamed, Seif
    Polyzois, Ioannis
    Renvert, Stefan
    Claffey, Noel
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (05) : 513 - 519
  • [15] Ultrashort Pulsed Laser Surface Patterning of Titanium to Improve Osseointegration of Dental Implants
    Zwahr, Christoph
    Welle, Alexander
    Weingaertner, Tobias
    Heinemann, Christiane
    Kruppke, Benjamin
    Gulow, Nikolai
    Holthaus, Marzellus Grosse
    Lasagni, Andres Fabian
    ADVANCED ENGINEERING MATERIALS, 2019, 21 (12)
  • [16] Influence of saliva interaction on surface properties manufactured for rapid osseointegration in dental implants
    Kunrath, Marcel F.
    Hubler, Roberto
    Silva, Raquel M.
    Barros, Marlene
    Teixeira, Eduardo R.
    Correia, Andre
    BIOFOULING, 2021, 37 (07) : 757 - 766
  • [17] DENTAL IMPLANTS EXPOSURE PREVENTION IN THEIR OSSEOINTEGRATION PERIOD
    Topalo, Elvira
    ROMANIAN JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 11 (02): : 43 - 48
  • [18] Influence of the Elastic Modulus on the Osseointegration of Dental Implants
    Brizuela, Aritza
    Herrero-Climent, Mariano
    Rios-Carrasco, Elisa
    Vicente Rios-Santos, Jose
    Perez, Roman A.
    Maria Manero, Jose
    Gil Mur, Javier
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (06):
  • [19] Osseointegration of dental implants in patients with and without radiotherapy
    Wagner, W
    Esser, E
    Ostkamp, K
    ACTA ONCOLOGICA, 1998, 37 (7-8) : 693 - 696
  • [20] Effect of hyaluronic acid on the osseointegration of dental implants
    Yazan, M.
    Kocyigit, I. D.
    Atil, F.
    Tekin, U.
    Gonen, Z. B.
    Onder, M. E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 57 (01): : 53 - 57