Lacosamide adjunctive therapy for partial-onset seizures: a meta-analysis

被引:9
作者
Sawh, Sonja C. [1 ]
Newman, Jennifer J. [2 ]
Deshpande, Santosh [1 ]
Jones, Philip M. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Univ Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr,Pharm Dept, Evidence Based Med Drug & Therapeut Comm Resource, London, ON N6A 5A5, Canada
[2] Victoria Hosp, London Hlth Sci Ctr, London, ON N6A 4G5, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anesthesia & Perioperat Med, London, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, London, ON, Canada
关键词
Systematic review; Meta-analysis; Lacosamide; Partial-onset seizures; Epilepsy; Antiepileptic drugs; Randomized controlled trials; LONG-TERM SAFETY; REFRACTORY PARTIAL EPILEPSY; ORAL LACOSAMIDE; ANTIEPILEPTIC DRUGS; INTERIM EVALUATION; DOUBLE-BLIND; INTRAVENOUS LACOSAMIDE; CLINICAL COMPARABILITY; PLASMA-CONCENTRATIONS; COST-EFFECTIVENESS;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.114
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. The relative efficacy and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive therapy compared to other antiepileptic drugs has not been well established. Objective. To determine if lacosamide provides improved efficacy and safety, reduced length of hospital stay and improved quality of life compared with other anti-epileptic therapies for adults with partial-onset seizures. Data Sources. A systematic review of the medical literature using Medline (1946-Week 4, 2012), EMBASE (1980-Week 3, 2012), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (Issue 1 of 12, January 2012). Additional studies were identified (through to February 7, 2012) by searching bibliographies, the FDA drug approval files, clinical trial registries and major national and international neurology meeting abstracts. No restrictions on publication status or language were applied. Study Selection. Randomized controlled trials of lacosamide in adults with partial-onset seizures were included. Data Extraction. Study selection, extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by two authors. Authors of studies were contacted for missing data. Data Synthesis. All pooled analyses used the random effects model. Results. Three trials (1311 patients) met inclusion criteria. Lacosamide increased the 50% responder rate compared to placebo (RR 1.68 [95% CI 1.36 to 2.08]; I-2 = 0%). Discontinuation due to adverse events was statistically significantly higher in the lacosamide arm (RR3.13 [95% CI 1.94 to 5.06]; I-2 = 0%). Individual adverse events (ataxia, dizziness, fatigue, and nausea) were also significantly higher in the lacosamide group. Limitations. All dosage arms from the included studies were pooled to make a single pair-wise comparison to placebo. Selective reporting of outcomes was found in all of the included RCTs. Conclusions. Lacosamide as adjunctive therapy in patients with partial-onset seizures increases the 50% responder rate but with significantly more adverse events compared to the placebo.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Specific instructions for estimating unclearly reported blinding status in randomized trials were reliable and valid [J].
Akl, Elie A. ;
Sun, Xin ;
Busse, Jason W. ;
Johnston, Bradley C. ;
Briel, Matthias ;
Mulla, Sohail ;
You, John J. ;
Bassler, Dirk ;
Lamontagne, Francois ;
Vera, Claudio ;
Alshurafa, Mohamad ;
Katsios, Christina M. ;
Heels-Ansdell, Diane ;
Zhou, Qi ;
Mills, Ed ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2012, 65 (03) :262-267
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Prescrire Int, V18, P196
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Med Lett Drugs Ther, V51, P50
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM EPILEPSY SOC PROG
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, COCHRANE DB SYST REV, DOI DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD008841
[6]  
[Anonymous], 9 4 4 1 MANTEL HAENS
[7]  
[Anonymous], NEUROCRITICAL CARE
[8]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE HDB
[9]  
[Anonymous], LAC MON
[10]  
[Anonymous], NEUROSCIENCES