Adherence Associated With Oral Medications in the Treatment of Spasticity

被引:24
作者
Halpern, Rachel [1 ]
Gillard, Patrick [2 ]
Graham, Glenn D. [3 ]
Varon, Sepideh F. [2 ]
Zorowitz, Richard D. [4 ]
机构
[1] OptumInsight, Hlth Econ & Outcomes Res, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 USA
[2] Allergan Pharmaceut Inc, Global Hlth Outcomes Strategy & Res, Irvine, CA 92715 USA
[3] Dept Vet Affairs, Washington, DC USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Johns Hopkins Bayview Med Ctr, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
SPINAL-CORD-INJURY; MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS; MANAGEMENT; STROKE; PERSISTENCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.04.022
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To examine adherence to badofen, tizanidine, and dantrolene (U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved oral spasticity medications), and identified determinants of adherence. Design: A retrospective administrative claims data analysis that used medical and pharmacy claims data and enrollment information from a large, national U.S. health plan. Subjects and Methods: The subjects were commercial health plan members who initiated treatment on badofen, tizanidine, or dantrolene from January 1, 2004, through September 30, 2009, and who had stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, cerebral palsy, or multiple sclerosis. Descriptive and logistic regression statistical analyses were performed. Main Outcome Measurements: Outcomes were adherence, measured as continuous medication possession ratio (MPR) and as a binary indicator (MPR >= 0.80, adherent; MPR <0.80, nonadherent), change in oral spasticity medication, and use of nonoral spasticity therapy. Results: The study population included 2840 subjects. Adherence overall was poor: the range of mean unadjusted MPR values was 0.10-0.50, which indicated that, at best, the subjects were adherent to their index spasticity medications for 50% of their treatment periods. Unadjusted overall MPRs for badofen and tizanidine were 20.4% and 9.1%, respectively. Fewer than 5% of subjects changed oral spasticity medications. The results of logistic regression to identify determinants of adherence showed that subjects treated with tizanidine versus badofen had 37.4% lower odds of adherence and that subjects with traumatic brain injury versus stroke had 77.5% lower odds of adherence. The odds of adherence increased with age and with preindex contracture or decubitus ulcer. Conclusions: Adherence to oral spasticity medication was poor irrespective of index spasticity medication or condition. Results from this study indicated that physicians cannot assume that patients are adherent to prescribed oral spasticity medications. A more complete understanding of the reasons behind nonadherence is required.
引用
收藏
页码:747 / 756
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Treatment satisfaction and adherence to medications among multiple sclerosis patients in Saudi Arabia
    Adel Alhazzani
    Mohammed Alqahtani
    Noof Alamri
    Leen Sarhan
    Shahad Alkhashrami
    Mohammed Alahmarii
    [J]. The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery, 55
  • [32] Treatment satisfaction and adherence to medications among multiple sclerosis patients in Saudi Arabia
    Alhazzani, Adel
    Alqahtani, Mohammed
    Alamri, Noof
    Sarhan, Leen
    Alkhashrami, Shahad
    Alahmarii, Mohammed
    [J]. EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY PSYCHIATRY AND NEUROSURGERY, 2019, 55 (01)
  • [33] Prevalence, impact and treatment of spasticity in nursing home patients with central nervous system disorders: a cross-sectional study
    Meijer, Ronald
    Wolswijk, Adrie
    van Eijsden, Hanna
    [J]. DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2017, 39 (04) : 363 - 371
  • [34] Patient Adherence to Novel Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation and Occurrence of Associated Bleeding Events: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Shehab, Abdulla
    Bhagavathula, Akshaya S.
    Abebe, Tamrat B.
    Abegaz, Tadesse M.
    Elnour, Asim A.
    Sabbour, Hani M.
    Uzzafer, Masood
    Hersi, Ahmed
    Hamad, Adel K.
    [J]. CURRENT VASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 17 (04) : 341 - 349
  • [35] Adherence measurement systems and technology for medications in older patient populations
    Stegemann, S.
    Baeyens, J. -P.
    Cerreta, F.
    Chanie, E.
    Lofgren, A.
    Maio, M.
    Schreier, G.
    Thesing-Bleck, E.
    [J]. EUROPEAN GERIATRIC MEDICINE, 2012, 3 (04) : 254 - 260
  • [36] Evaluating Use Patterns of and Adherence to Medications for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia
    Nichol, Michael B.
    Knight, Tara K.
    Wu, Joanne
    Barron, Richard
    Penson, David F.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2009, 181 (05) : 2214 - 2221
  • [37] Association Between Copayment and Adherence to Medications for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Schikowski, Erin M.
    Swabe, Gretchen
    Chan, Stephen Y.
    Magnani, Jared W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2022, 11 (22):
  • [38] Individual and Community-Level Characteristics and Adherence to Specialty Medications
    Kibbons, Amanda M.
    Moore, Ryan
    Choi, Leena
    Peter, Megan
    Zuckerman, Autumn D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2024, 37 (02) : 279 - 286
  • [39] Adherence to Cardiac Medications in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Pilot Study
    Pacleb, Adrienne
    Lowres, Nicole
    Randall, Sue
    Neubeck, Lis
    Gallagher, Robyn
    [J]. HEART LUNG AND CIRCULATION, 2020, 29 (07) : E131 - E139
  • [40] Patient perspectives on the barriers associated with medication adherence to oral chemotherapy
    Muluneh, Benyam
    Deal, Allison
    Alexander, Maurice D.
    Keisler, Meredith D.
    Markey, Janell M.
    Neal, Jennifer M.
    Bernard, Stephen
    Valgus, John
    Dressler, Lynn G.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2018, 24 (02) : 98 - 109