Greenwashing Revisited: In Search of a Typology and Accusation-Based Definition Incorporating Legitimacy Strategies

被引:282
作者
Seele, Peter [1 ]
Gatti, Lucia [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Svizzera Italiana, Inst Mkt & Commun Management, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
greenwashing; environment; sustainability; legitimacy theory; signaling theory; corporate social responsibility; CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE; ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; MANAGING LEGITIMACY; GREEN; MANAGEMENT; DISCLOSURE; CONSUMERS; RESPONSES; CONTEXT;
D O I
10.1002/bse.1912
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Is greenwashing a concept describing companies using misleading communication or is it co-constructed in the eye of the beholder? By discussing the literature, we find that existing definitions of greenwashing overemphasize the strategic intention to mislead and do not incorporate unjust allegations. Then, by combining signaling theory with legitimacy theory, we frame the communication process of the greenwashing accusation and the emergence of a negative narrative caused by the accusation and its effect on legitimacy. Hence, in this paper we argue that greenwashing epistemologically is constituted in the eye of the beholder, depending on an external accusation. Following this view, the greenwashing accusation is understood as a distortion factor altering the signal reliability of green messages. Based on our conceptual analysis, we provide a conceptual framework introducing a new typology of case-based greenwashing (greenwashing, false greenwashing, potential greenwashing and no greenwashing) and the effects of these types on corporate legitimacy. Finally, we propose a revised definition of greenwashing as co-creation of an external accusation toward an organization with regard to presenting a misleading green message. Copyright (C) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 252
页数:14
相关论文
共 90 条
[61]  
Pearson J., 2010, The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, P37, DOI [10.9774/gleaf.4700.2010.sp.00006, DOI 10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2010.sp.00006]
[62]   The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility Associations on Trust in Organic Products Marketed by Mainstream Retailers: a Study of Italian Consumers [J].
Perrini, Francesco ;
Castaldo, Sandro ;
Misani, Nicola ;
Tencati, Antonio .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2010, 19 (08) :512-526
[63]  
Pfeffer J., 1978, The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective
[64]  
Prakash A., 2002, BUS STRATEG ENVIRON, V11, P285, DOI 10.1002/bse.338
[65]  
Prothero A., 1997, Business Strategy and the Environment, V6, P74, DOI DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0836(199705)6:23.0.CO
[66]  
2-4
[67]  
Ramus C.A., 2005, Business Society, V44, P377, DOI [10.1177/0007650305278120, DOI 10.1177/0007650305278120]
[68]  
Russo MV, 2005, ACAD MANAGE J, V48, P582, DOI 10.2307/20159680
[69]   Transdisciplinarity in Corporate Sustainability: Mapping the Field [J].
Schaltegger, Stefan ;
Beckmann, Markus ;
Hansen, Erik G. .
BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2013, 22 (04) :219-229
[70]   Managing Legitimacy in Complex and Heterogeneous Environments: Sustainable Development in a Globalized World [J].
Scherer, Andreas Georg ;
Palazzo, Guido ;
Seidl, David .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT STUDIES, 2013, 50 (02) :259-284