Accuracy of four-dimensional phase-contrast velocity mapping for blood flow visualizations: a phantom study

被引:15
作者
Nilsson, Anders [1 ]
Bloch, Karin Markenroth [2 ]
Toger, Johannes [3 ,4 ]
Heiberg, Einar [3 ,4 ]
Stahlberg, Freddy [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Med Radiat Phys, Lund, Sweden
[2] Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Physiol, Skane Univ Hosp, Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Lund Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Phase errors; background phase correction; blood flow visualization; phase-contrast imaging; velocity mapping; K-T BLAST; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GREAT-VESSELS; MRI; 3D; SENSE; QUANTIFICATION; PATTERNS; HEART; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0284185113478005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Time-resolved three-dimensional, three-directional phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping (4D PC-MRI) is a powerful technique to depict dynamic blood flow patterns in the human body. However, the impact of phase background effects on flow visualizations has not been thoroughly studied previously, and it has not yet been experimentally demonstrated to what degree phase offsets affect flow visualizations and create errors such as inaccurate particle traces. Purpose: To quantify background phase offsets and their subsequent impact on particle trace visualizations in a 4D PC-MRI sequence. Additionally, we sought to investigate to what degree visualization errors are reduced by background phase correction. Material and Methods: A rotating phantom with a known velocity field was used to quantify background phase of 4D PC-MRI sequences accelerated with SENSE as well as different k-t BLAST speed-up factors. The deviation in end positions between particle traces in the measured velocity fields were compared before and after the application of two different phase correction methods. Results: Phantom measurements revealed background velocity offsets up to 7 cm/s (7% of velocity encoding sensitivity) in the central slice, increasing with distance from the center. Background offsets remained constant with increasing k-t BLAST speed-up factors. End deviations of up to 5.3 mm (1.8 voxels) in the direction perpendicular to the rotating disc were found between particle traces and the seeding plane of the traces. Phase correction by subtraction of the data from the stationary phantom reduced the average deviation by up to 56%, while correcting the data-set with a first-order polynomial fit to stationary regions decreased average deviation up to 78%. Conclusion: Pathline visualizations can be significantly affected by background phase errors, highlighting the importance of dedicated and robust phase correction methods. Our results show that pathline deviation can be substantial if adequate phase background errors are not minimized.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 671
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Comparison of fast acquisition strategies in whole-heart four-dimensional flow cardiac MR: Two-center, 1.5 Tesla, phantom and in vivo validation study [J].
Garg, Pankaj ;
Westenberg, Jos J. M. ;
van den Boogaard, Pieter J. ;
Swoboda, Peter P. ;
Aziz, Rahoz ;
Foley, James R. J. ;
Fent, Graham J. ;
Tyl, F. G. J. ;
Coratella, L. ;
ElBaz, Mohammed S. M. ;
van der Geest, R. J. ;
Higgins, David M. ;
Greenwood, John P. ;
Plein, Sven .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2018, 47 (01) :272-281
[42]   4-D flow magnetic resonance imaging: blood flow quantification compared to 2-D phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography [J].
Gabbour, Maya ;
Schnell, Susanne ;
Jarvis, Kelly ;
Robinson, Joshua D. ;
Markl, Michael ;
Rigsby, Cynthia K. .
PEDIATRIC RADIOLOGY, 2015, 45 (06) :804-813
[43]   Baseline correction does not improve flow quantification in phase-contrast velocity measurement for routine clinical practice [J].
Meierhofer, Christian ;
Lyko, Christine ;
Schneider, Eike Philipp ;
Stern, Heiko ;
Martinoff, Stefan ;
Hess, John ;
Fratz, Sohrab .
CLINICAL IMAGING, 2015, 39 (03) :427-431
[44]   Four-Dimensional Flow MRI for the Evaluation of Aortic Endovascular Graft: A Pilot Study [J].
Righini, Paolo ;
Secchi, Francesco ;
Mazzaccaro, Daniela ;
Giese, Daniel ;
Galligani, Marina ;
Avishay, Dor ;
Capra, Davide ;
Monti, Caterina Beatrice ;
Nano, Giovanni .
DIAGNOSTICS, 2023, 13 (12)
[45]   Validation of 3D Ultra-Short TE (UTE) Phase-Contrast MRI for Imaging of Steady Flow: Initial Phantom Experiments [J].
Kadbi, Mo ;
Negahdar, M. J. ;
Cha, Jung Won ;
Traughber, Melanie ;
Martin, Peter ;
Amini, Amir A. .
2012 ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2012, :372-376
[46]   Flow-Sensitive Four-Dimensional Cine Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Offline Blood Flow Quantification in Multiple Vessels: A Validation Study [J].
Nordmeyer, Sarah ;
Riesenkampff, Eugenie ;
Crelier, Gerard ;
Khasheei, Alireza ;
Schnackenburg, Bernhard ;
Berger, Felix ;
Kuehne, Titus .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2010, 32 (03) :677-683
[47]   Automated Quantification of Total Cerebral Blood Flow from Phase-Contrast MRI and Deep Learning [J].
Kim, Jinwon ;
Lee, Hyebin ;
Oh, Sung Suk ;
Jang, Jinhee ;
Lee, Hyunyeol .
JOURNAL OF IMAGING INFORMATICS IN MEDICINE, 2024, 37 (02) :563-574
[48]   Optimized analysis of blood flow and wall shear stress in the common carotid artery of rat model by phase-contrast MRI [J].
Peng, Shin-Lei ;
Shih, Cheng-Ting ;
Huang, Chiun-Wei ;
Chiu, Shao-Chieh ;
Shen, Wu-Chung .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
[49]   Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging and computational fluid dynamics assessment of thoracic aorta blood flow: a literature review [J].
Jarral, Omar A. ;
Tan, Matthew K. H. ;
Salmasi, Mohammad Yousuf ;
Pirola, Selene ;
Pepper, John R. ;
O'Regan, Declan P. ;
Xu, Xiao Y. ;
Athanasiou, Thanos .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2020, 57 (03) :438-446
[50]   Assessment of blood flow and valvular heart disease using phase-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance [J].
Dall'Armellina, Erica ;
Hamilton, Craig A. ;
Hundley, W. Gregory .
ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY-A JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR ULTRASOUND AND ALLIED TECHNIQUES, 2007, 24 (02) :207-216