Accuracy of four-dimensional phase-contrast velocity mapping for blood flow visualizations: a phantom study

被引:15
作者
Nilsson, Anders [1 ]
Bloch, Karin Markenroth [2 ]
Toger, Johannes [3 ,4 ]
Heiberg, Einar [3 ,4 ]
Stahlberg, Freddy [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Dept Med Radiat Phys, Lund, Sweden
[2] Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands
[3] Lund Univ, Dept Clin Physiol, Skane Univ Hosp, Lund, Sweden
[4] Lund Univ, Ctr Math Sci, Lund, Sweden
[5] Lund Univ, Dept Diagnost Radiol, Lund, Sweden
关键词
Phase errors; background phase correction; blood flow visualization; phase-contrast imaging; velocity mapping; K-T BLAST; CARDIOVASCULAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; GREAT-VESSELS; MRI; 3D; SENSE; QUANTIFICATION; PATTERNS; HEART; FEASIBILITY;
D O I
10.1177/0284185113478005
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Time-resolved three-dimensional, three-directional phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping (4D PC-MRI) is a powerful technique to depict dynamic blood flow patterns in the human body. However, the impact of phase background effects on flow visualizations has not been thoroughly studied previously, and it has not yet been experimentally demonstrated to what degree phase offsets affect flow visualizations and create errors such as inaccurate particle traces. Purpose: To quantify background phase offsets and their subsequent impact on particle trace visualizations in a 4D PC-MRI sequence. Additionally, we sought to investigate to what degree visualization errors are reduced by background phase correction. Material and Methods: A rotating phantom with a known velocity field was used to quantify background phase of 4D PC-MRI sequences accelerated with SENSE as well as different k-t BLAST speed-up factors. The deviation in end positions between particle traces in the measured velocity fields were compared before and after the application of two different phase correction methods. Results: Phantom measurements revealed background velocity offsets up to 7 cm/s (7% of velocity encoding sensitivity) in the central slice, increasing with distance from the center. Background offsets remained constant with increasing k-t BLAST speed-up factors. End deviations of up to 5.3 mm (1.8 voxels) in the direction perpendicular to the rotating disc were found between particle traces and the seeding plane of the traces. Phase correction by subtraction of the data from the stationary phantom reduced the average deviation by up to 56%, while correcting the data-set with a first-order polynomial fit to stationary regions decreased average deviation up to 78%. Conclusion: Pathline visualizations can be significantly affected by background phase errors, highlighting the importance of dedicated and robust phase correction methods. Our results show that pathline deviation can be substantial if adequate phase background errors are not minimized.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 671
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Four-dimensional flow MRI for evaluation of post-stenotic turbulent flow in a phantom: comparison with flowmeter and computational fluid dynamics
    Kweon, Jihoon
    Yang, Dong Hyun
    Kim, Guk Bae
    Kim, Namkug
    Paek, MunYoung
    Stalder, Aurelien F.
    Greiser, Andreas
    Kim, Young-Hak
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2016, 26 (10) : 3588 - 3597
  • [22] Four-dimensional velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging improves blood flow quantification in patients with complex accelerated flow
    Nordmeyer, Sarah
    Riesenkampff, Eugenie
    Messroghli, Daniel
    Kropf, Siegfried
    Nordmeyer, Johannes
    Berger, Felix
    Kuehne, Titus
    JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2013, 37 (01) : 208 - 216
  • [23] Velocity mapping of the aortic flow at 9.4 T in healthy mice and mice with induced heart failure using time-resolved three-dimensional phase-contrast MRI (4D PC MRI)
    Bovenkamp, Philipp Rene
    Brix, Tobias
    Lindemann, Florian
    Holtmeier, Richard
    Abdurrachim, Desiree
    Kuhlmann, Michael T.
    Strijkers, Gustav J.
    Stypmann, Joerg
    Hinrichs, Klaus H.
    Hoerr, Verena
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (04) : 315 - 327
  • [24] Analysis and correction of background velocity offsets in phase-contrast flow measurements using magnetic field monitoring
    Giese, Daniel
    Haeberlin, Maximilian
    Barmet, Christoph
    Pruessmann, Klaas P.
    Schaeffter, Tobias
    Kozerke, Sebastian
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2012, 67 (05) : 1294 - 1302
  • [25] Hemodynamics in a three-dimensional printed aortic model: a comparison of four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance and image-based computational fluid dynamics
    Park, Jieun
    Kim, Junghun
    Hyun, Sinjae
    Lee, Jongmin
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE MATERIALS IN PHYSICS BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2022, 35 (05) : 719 - 732
  • [26] Accurate measurement of pulsatile flow velocity in a small tube phantom: comparison of phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging and intraluminal Doppler guidewire
    Machida, Haruhiko
    Komori, Yoshiaki
    Ueno, Eiko
    Shen, Yun
    Hirata, Masami
    Kojima, Shinya
    Sato, Munekuni
    Okazaki, Takeshi
    Masukawa, Ai
    Morita, Satoru
    Suzuki, Kazufumi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2010, 28 (08): : 571 - 577
  • [27] Phase-contrast MRI analysis of cerebral blood and CSF flow dynamic interactions
    Owashi, Kimi Piedad
    Liu, Pan
    Metanbou, Serge
    Capel, Cyrille
    Baledent, Olivier
    FLUIDS AND BARRIERS OF THE CNS, 2024, 21 (01):
  • [28] Model-Based Reconstruction for Real-Time Phase-Contrast Flow MRI: Improved Spatiotemporal Accuracy
    Tan, Zhengguo
    Roeloffs, Volkert
    Voit, Dirk
    Joseph, Arun A.
    Untenberger, Markus
    Merboldt, K. Dietmar
    Frahm, Jens
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 77 (03) : 1082 - 1093
  • [29] Phase-contrast MRI with hybrid one and two-sided flow-encoding and velocity spectrum separation
    Wang, Da
    Shao, Jiaxin
    Ennis, Daniel B.
    Hu, Peng
    MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2017, 78 (01) : 182 - 192
  • [30] Accuracy of Conventional Oximetry for Flow Estimation in Patients With Superior Cavopulmonary Connection A Comparison With Phase-Contrast Cardiac MRI
    Downing, Tacy E.
    Whitehead, Kevin K.
    Dori, Yoav
    Gillespie, Matthew J.
    Harris, Matthew A.
    Fogel, Mark A.
    Rome, Jonathan J.
    Glatz, Andrew C.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2013, 6 (06) : 943 - 949