Specific vulnerability assessment of nitrate in shallow groundwater with an improved DRSTIC-LE model

被引:31
|
作者
Liang, Ji [1 ]
Li, Zijun [2 ,3 ]
Yang, Qingchun [2 ,3 ]
Lei, Xiaohui [4 ]
Kang, Aiqing [4 ]
Li, Shanfei [5 ]
机构
[1] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Hydropower & Informat Engn, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Jilin Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Groundwater Resources & Environm, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
[3] Jilin Univ, Coll New Energy & Environm, Changchun 130021, Jilin, Peoples R China
[4] China Inst Water Resources & Hydropower Res, Beijing 010000, Peoples R China
[5] Beijing Inst Survey & Design, Beijing 010000, Peoples R China
关键词
Specific vulnerability assessment; Nitrate; EW-AHP weight method; DRSTIC-LE model; Datong basin; RISK-ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; DRASTIC METHOD; POLLUTION; AQUIFER; OPTIMIZATION; OVERLAY; BASIN; AREA;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.03.024
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Datong basin is one of the most important agriculture zone of Shanxi Province, China, where intensive fertilizer and pesticide applications cause the groundwater contamination. Hence, it is necessary to carry out groundwater specific vulnerability assessment of nitrate. The prediction accuracy of conventional DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment is severely limited by the inherent subjectivity in determining main parameters, rating scales and weighting coefficients. This paper attempts to overcome these problems by changing the evaluation parameters, parameters rating and weight calculation method. Based on the hydro geological conditions and nitrate pollution characteristics of Datong Basin, the traditional groundwater vulnerability model DRASTIC was improved, called DRSTIC-LE model to assess the specific vulnerability of nitrate, which involves Depth of water table (D), Net recharge (R), Soil media (S), Topography (T), Impact of the vadose zone (I), hydraulic Conductivity (C), land use type (L), and groundwater exploitation (E) as evaluation parameters. And the theoretical weight of each parameter were determined with the aid of the improved weights determination method by the effective combination of the entropy weight method and analytic hierarchy process. Moreover, single-parameter sensitivity analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of each parameter on the groundwater specific vulnerability. According to the results of groundwater specific vulnerability map, very high and high vulnerability mainly situated in central, northern and northeastern portion of study area, with 6.25%, 17.93% of total area, respectively. Also, single-parameter sensitivity analysis represented that I and D are the main parameter which impacts groundwater to pollution while C contributes least to pollution in the Datong basin. The model is validated with the measured nitrate concentration and results have shown better correlation between SVI and nitrate concentration. Additionally, by comparing the correlation between the effective weights and the theoretical weights calculated by the three methods (EW, AHP and EW-AHP method), we can see that prediction accuracy of the EW-AHP method is higher than other methods. The research established the efficacy of EW-AHP method as a method of determining weights and provided a basis for regional control of groundwater nitrate pollution.
引用
收藏
页码:649 / 657
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Assessment of sources and fate of nitrate in shallow groundwater of an agricultural area by using a multi-tracer approach
    Pasten-Zapata, Ernesto
    Ledesma-Ruiz, Rogelio
    Harter, Thomas
    Ramirez, Aldo I.
    Mahlknecht, Juergen
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 470 : 855 - 864
  • [22] GIS Based Assessment of Groundwater Vulnerability Using Drastic Model
    Kumar, Sathees
    Thirumalaivasan, D.
    Radhakrishnan, Nisha
    ARABIAN JOURNAL FOR SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 39 (01) : 207 - 216
  • [23] Quantitative Assessment of Specific Vulnerability to Nitrate Pollution of Shallow Alluvial Aquifers by Process-Based and Empirical Approaches
    Fusco, Francesco
    Allocca, Vincenzo
    Coda, Silvio
    Cusano, Delia
    Tufano, Rita
    De Vita, Pantaleone
    WATER, 2020, 12 (01)
  • [24] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using SINTACS model
    Kumar, Sathees
    Thirumalaivasan, D.
    Radhakrishnan, Nisha
    Mathew, Samson
    GEOMATICS NATURAL HAZARDS & RISK, 2013, 4 (04) : 339 - 354
  • [25] Introducing reverse Multi Influencing Factor technique in DRASTIC model for groundwater vulnerability assessment
    Ganwer, Sandhya
    Sinha, Manish Kumar
    Multaniya, Amit Prakash
    Ghodichore, Nikhil
    GROUNDWATER FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2024, 25
  • [26] Groundwater vulnerability assessment in shallow aquifer of Kathmandu Valley using GIS-based DRASTIC model
    Pathak, Dhundi Raj
    Hiratsuka, Akira
    Awata, Isao
    Chen, Luonan
    ENVIRONMENTAL GEOLOGY, 2009, 57 (07): : 1569 - 1578
  • [27] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using the GALDIT model and the improved DRASTIC model: a case in Weibei Plain, China
    Hu, Xiaojing
    Ma, Chuanming
    Qi, Huihui
    Guo, Xu
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2018, 25 (32) : 32524 - 32539
  • [28] Assessment of groundwater nitrate vulnerability using DRASTIC and modified DRASTIC in upper catchment of Sabarmati basin
    Gupta, Tanushree
    Kumari, Rina
    ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES, 2023, 82 (09)
  • [29] Geostatistical Assessment of Groundwater Nitrate Contamination with Reflection on DRASTIC Vulnerability Assessment: The Case of the Upper Litani Basin, Lebanon
    Assaf, H.
    Saadeh, M.
    WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2009, 23 (04) : 775 - 796
  • [30] Groundwater vulnerability assessment using an improved DRASTIC method in GIS
    Neshat, Aminreza
    Pradhan, Biswajeet
    Dadras, Mohsen
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2014, 86 : 74 - 86