Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:28
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Effectiveness of interprofessional shared decision-making training: A mixed-method study
    Hsiao, Chih-Yin
    Wu, Jeng-Cheng
    Lin, Pi-Chu
    Yang, Pang-Yuan
    Liao, Faith
    Guo, Shu-Liu
    Hou, Wen-Hsuan
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2022, 105 (11) : 3287 - 3297
  • [42] Shared Decision-Making Aid for Stroke-Prevention Strategies in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Maintenance Hemodialysis (SIMPLIFY-HD): A Mixed-Methods Study
    Masse, Olivier
    Maurice, Noemie
    Hong, Yu
    Mercurio, Claudia
    Tremblay, Catherine
    Senecal, Lysane
    Bernier-Jean, Amelie
    Dugre, Nicolas
    Dallaire, Gabriel
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY HEALTH AND DISEASE, 2025, 12
  • [43] Goal setting and goal attainment in patients with major depressive disorder: a narrative review on shared decision making in clinical practice
    Baldwin, David S.
    Adair, Michael
    Micheelsen, Arun
    Astrom, Daniel Oudin
    Reines, Elin H.
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2024, 40 (03) : 483 - 491
  • [44] Goal setting as a shared decision making strategy among clinicians and their older patients
    Schulman-Green, Dena J.
    Naik, Aanand D.
    Bradley, Elizabeth H.
    McCorkle, Ruth
    Bogardus, Sidney T.
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2006, 63 (1-2) : 145 - 151
  • [45] GPs' perceptions of teaching methods in shared decision-making training: a qualitative study
    Nyamapfene, Taona
    Butterworth, Joanne
    Merchant, Haider
    Eaton, Mike
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (729) : E310 - E317
  • [46] A decision aid is not the quick fix for improving shared decision-making in advanced Parkinson's disease: results of a mixed methods feasibility study
    Nijhuis, Frouke A. P.
    Schippers, Bas
    Bloem, Bastiaan R.
    Post, Bart
    Meinders, Marjan J.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2025, 272 (04)
  • [47] Healthcare providers' intentions to engage in an interprofessional approach to shared decision-making in home care programs: A mixed methods study
    Legare, France
    Stacey, Dawn
    Briere, Nathalie
    Fraser, Kimberley
    Desroches, Sophie
    Dumont, Serge
    Sales, Anne
    Puma, Carole
    Aube, Denise
    JOURNAL OF INTERPROFESSIONAL CARE, 2013, 27 (03) : 214 - 222
  • [48] The ShaDeS (Shared Decision-making in Stillbirth) study: Information, communication and shared decision-making after a stillbirth diagnosis in Italy
    Ravaldi, Claudia
    Mercuro, Chiara
    Mosconi, Laura
    Roper, Francesca
    Lotto, Lorella
    Vannacci, Alfredo
    Gavaruzzi, Teresa
    MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2024, 44 (02) : NP171 - NP172
  • [49] Shared decision-making in psychiatry: a study of patient attitudes
    Nott, Josie
    Mcintosh, Aspen
    Taube, Clare
    Taylor, Mark
    AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY, 2018, 26 (05) : 478 - 481
  • [50] Prevalence and predictors of shared decision-making in goals-of-care clinician-family meetings for critically ill neurologic patients: a multi-center mixed-methods study
    Victoria Fleming
    Abhinav Prasad
    Connie Ge
    Sybil Crawford
    Shazeb Meraj
    Catherine L. Hough
    Bernard Lo
    Shannon S. Carson
    Jay Steingrub
    Douglas B. White
    Susanne Muehlschlegel
    Critical Care, 27