Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:28
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Piloting a shared decision-making clinician training intervention in maternity care in Australia: A mixed methods study
    Clerke, Teena
    Margetts, Jayne
    Donovan, Helen
    Shepherd, Heather L.
    Makris, Angela
    Canty, Alison
    Ruhotas, Annette
    Catling, Christine
    Henry, Amanda
    MIDWIFERY, 2023, 126
  • [32] Improving shared decision-making in advanced Parkinson's disease: Protocol of a mixed methods feasibility study
    Nijhuis F.A.P.
    Elwyn G.
    Bloem B.R.
    Post B.
    Faber M.J.
    Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4 (1)
  • [33] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Anne C Melzer
    Sara E. Golden
    Sarah S. Ono
    Santanu Datta
    Kristina Crothers
    Christopher G. Slatore
    Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2020, 35 : 546 - 553
  • [34] What Exactly Is Shared Decision-Making? A Qualitative Study of Shared Decision-Making in Lung Cancer Screening
    Melzer, Anne C.
    Golden, Sara E.
    Ono, Sarah S.
    Datta, Santanu
    Crothers, Kristina
    Slatore, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2020, 35 (02) : 546 - 553
  • [35] Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography
    Kiran Pohar Manhas
    Karin Olson
    Katie Churchill
    Sunita Vohra
    Tracy Wasylak
    BMC Health Services Research, 20
  • [36] Shared Decision Making with Acutely Hospitalized, Older Poly-Medicated Patients: A Mixed-Methods Study in an Emergency Department
    Fabricius, Pia Keinicke
    Aharaz, Anissa
    Stefansdottir, Nina Thorny
    Houlind, Morten Baltzer
    Steffensen, Karina Dahl
    Andersen, Ove
    Kirk, Jeanette Wassar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (11)
  • [37] A multicentre study of how goal-setting is practised during inpatient stroke rehabilitation
    Plant, Sarah
    Tyson, Sarah F.
    CLINICAL REHABILITATION, 2018, 32 (02) : 263 - 272
  • [38] A mixed-methods study of provider perspectives on My Birth Control: a contraceptive decision support tool designed to facilitate shared decision making
    Dehlendorf, Christine
    Reed, Reiley
    Fitzpatrick, Judith
    Kuppermann, Miriam
    Steinauer, Jody
    Kimport, Katrina
    CONTRACEPTION, 2019, 100 (05) : 420 - 423
  • [39] Experiences of shared decision-making in community rehabilitation: a focused ethnography
    Manhas, Kiran Pohar
    Olson, Karin
    Churchill, Katie
    Vohra, Sunita
    Wasylak, Tracy
    BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (01)
  • [40] Post-training Shared Decision Making Barriers and Facilitators for Pediatric Healthcare Providers: updates A Mixed-Methods Study
    Boland, Laura
    Lawson, Margaret L.
    Graham, Ian D.
    Legere, France
    Dorrance, Kristin
    Shephard, Allyson
    Stacey, Dawn
    ACADEMIC PEDIATRICS, 2019, 19 (01) : 118 - 129