Shared decision-making within goal-setting in rehabilitation: a mixed-methods study

被引:28
|
作者
Rose, Alice [1 ]
Soundy, Andy [1 ]
Rosewilliam, Sheeba [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
关键词
Shared decision-making; goal-setting; community rehabilitation; frail elders; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; COMMUNICATION BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1177/0269215518815251
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: To assess the extent of shared decision-making within goal-setting meetings and explore patient-reported factors that influenced their participation to shared decision-making about their goals. Design: A two-phase explanatory sequential mixed-methods study, using questionnaires and interviews. Setting: A rehabilitation centre and patients' homes. Subjects: Frail elderly patients. Main Measures: Quantitative data were collected after every patient's goal-setting meeting using the Multifocal Approach to Sharing in Shared Decision Making (MAPPIN'SDM) questionnaire that assesses competencies relevant to shared decision-making. Shared decision-making was rated by an observer, patients and staff and compared. Qualitative data were collected through semi-structured interviews. Results: A total of 24 rehabilitation team members and 40 patients (mean age: 83 years) participated. All study participants felt that competency 7a (the language used by staff made sense to the patient) was observed in all meetings. Patients reported that for 22 of the meetings competency 4a, the advantages and disadvantages of rehabilitation, was not discussed. Games-Howell tests for direction of differences between groups showed significant difference (P = 0.001) between patients and staff in whether patients' problems were discussed. Nine patients' interviews suggested that motivation, self-confidence, family support, preparing themselves, getting information about goal-setting and rehabilitation options could enable them to participate in shared decision-making. They suggested that staff should communicate clearly and demonstrate that they are listening to patients but without a paternalistic approach. Conclusion: Staff exhibited most shared decision-making competencies at a good level. However, patients highlighted problems with information sharing and felt staff might not be listening to them. Research and practice should explore tools to address these shortfalls.
引用
收藏
页码:564 / 574
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A conversation approach based on shared goal-setting and shared decision-making for nurses in cancer aftercare: A developmental study
    Friesen-Storms, Jolanda H. H. M.
    Bours, Gerrie J. J. W.
    Snijders, Ingrid C. G.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Jie, Kon-Siong G.
    Beurskens, Anna J. H. M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY NURSING, 2018, 35 : 107 - 116
  • [2] Shared decision making within goal setting in rehabilitation settings: A systematic review
    Rose, Alice
    Rosewilliam, Sheeba
    Soundy, Andrew
    PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2017, 100 (01) : 65 - 75
  • [3] IMPLEMENTATION OF BEST PRACTICE GOAL-SETTING IN FIVE REHABILITATION SERVICES: A MIXED-METHODS EVALUATION STUDY
    Baker, Amanda
    Rehab, Masters Comm
    Cornwell, Petrea
    Gustafsson, Louise
    Stewart, Claire
    Lannin, Natasha A.
    JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2023, 55
  • [4] Multiethnic Perspectives of Shared Decision-Making in Hypertension: A Mixed-Methods Study
    Elias, Sabrina
    Wenzel, Jennifer
    Cooper, Lisa A.
    Perrin, Nancy
    Commodore-Mensah, Yvonne
    Lewis, Krystina B.
    Koirala, Binu
    Slone, Sarah
    Byiringiro, Samuel
    Marsteller, Jill
    Himmelfarb, Cheryl R.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2024, 13 (14):
  • [5] Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders' Perspectives
    Coutu, Marie-France
    Legare, France
    Durand, Marie-Jose
    Stacey, Dawn
    Labrecque, Marie-Elise
    Corbiere, Marc
    Bainbridge, Lesley
    JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2019, 29 (01) : 128 - 139
  • [6] Acceptability and Feasibility of a Shared Decision-Making Model in Work Rehabilitation: A Mixed-Methods Study of Stakeholders’ Perspectives
    Marie-France Coutu
    France Légaré
    Marie-José Durand
    Dawn Stacey
    Marie-Elise Labrecque
    Marc Corbière
    Lesley Bainbridge
    Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 2019, 29 : 128 - 139
  • [7] A survey of goal-setting methods used in rehabilitation
    Holliday, RC
    Antoun, M
    Playford, ED
    NEUROREHABILITATION AND NEURAL REPAIR, 2005, 19 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [8] Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict - study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Yu, Catherine H.
    Ivers, Noah M.
    Stacey, Dawn
    Rezmovitz, Jeremy
    Telner, Deanna
    Thorpe, Kevin
    Hall, Susan
    Settino, Marc
    Kaplan, David M.
    Coons, Michael
    Sodhi, Sumeet
    Sale, Joanna
    Straus, Sharon E.
    TRIALS, 2015, 16
  • [9] Impact of an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes on decisional conflict – study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
    Catherine H. Yu
    Noah M. Ivers
    Dawn Stacey
    Jeremy Rezmovitz
    Deanna Telner
    Kevin Thorpe
    Susan Hall
    Marc Settino
    David M. Kaplan
    Michael Coons
    Sumeet Sodhi
    Joanna Sale
    Sharon E. Straus
    Trials, 16
  • [10] Designing and evaluating an interprofessional shared decision-making and goal-setting decision aid for patients with diabetes in clinical care - systematic decision aid development and study protocol
    Yu, Catherine H.
    Stacey, Dawn
    Sale, Joanna
    Hall, Susan
    Kaplan, David M.
    Ivers, Noah
    Rezmovitz, Jeremy
    Leung, Fok-Han
    Shah, Baiju R.
    Straus, Sharon E.
    IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE, 2014, 9