Estimability Analysis and Optimisation of Soil Hydraulic Parameters from Field Lysimeter Data

被引:18
作者
Ngo, V. V. [1 ,2 ]
Latifi, M. A. [1 ]
Simonnot, M. -O. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lorraine, Lab React & Genie Proc, CNRS, F-54001 Nancy, France
[2] Univ Strasbourg, EOST, CNRS, Lab Hydrol & Geochim Strasbourg, F-67084 Strasbourg, France
关键词
Estimability analysis; HYDRUS-1D; Lysimeter; Parameter optimisation; Single-porosity model; TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY; WATER-FLOW; SOLUTE TRANSPORT; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; INFORMATION-CONTENT; PREFERENTIAL FLOW; MODEL; CONDUCTIVITY; INFILTRATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11242-013-0155-9
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Modelling the water-flow in the vadose zone requires accurate hydraulic parameters to be obtained at the relevant scale. Weighable lysimeters enable us to monitor hydraulic data at an intermediate scale between lab and field scales and they can be used to optimise these parameters. Parameter optimisation using inverse methods may be limited by the non-uniqueness of the solution. In this contribution, an estimability method has been used to assess the estimability of the van Genuchten-Mualem parameters, to evaluate the information content of the data collected from a bare field lysimeter and to optimise the estimable model parameters. Daily data were monitored from a 2 lysimeter, filled with the soil of a former coking plant: pressure heads and water contents were measured at three depths (50, 100, 150 cm), cumulative boundary water fluxes. Water-flow was represented using the one-dimensional single-porosity model implemented in HYDRUS-1D code. The estimability of the 5 van Genuchten-Mualem hydraulic parameters and the information content of different data were evaluated by sequentially calculating a sensitivity coefficient matrix. Optimisation was achieved by the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm. The estimability analysis revealed that estimability of the soil hydraulic parameters, based on the combination of daily pressure heads and water contents, was higher than those based on these data separately. In case of 2.4 being considered as a cut-off criterion for this study, all the parameters were considered estimable from daily data in the decreasing order: . Hydraulic parameters were optimised in four scenarios: and n were estimated with reliability while and were uncertain. However, the narrow variations in measured data restricted parameter optimisation.
引用
收藏
页码:485 / 504
页数:20
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]   Two-dimensional simulation of water flow and solute transport below furrows: model calibration and validation [J].
Abbasi, F ;
Feyen, J ;
van Genuchten, MT .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 290 (1-2) :63-79
[2]   Uncertainty in estimation of soil hydraulic parameters by inverse modeling: Example lysimeter experiments [J].
Abbaspour, KC ;
Sonnleitner, MA ;
Schulin, R .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1999, 63 (03) :501-509
[3]   Estimating unsaturated soil hydraulic parameters using ant colony optimization [J].
Abbaspour, KC ;
Schulin, R ;
van Genuchten, MT .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2001, 24 (08) :827-841
[4]   Simulation of water flow and solute transport in free-drainage lysimeters and field soils with heterogeneous structures [J].
Abdou, HM ;
Flury, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2004, 55 (02) :229-241
[5]  
[Anonymous], P INT S SOIL PHYS RU
[6]  
[Anonymous], 56 FAO IRR DRAIN
[7]  
[Anonymous], TRANSPORT HYDROCARBU
[8]  
[Anonymous], THESIS INPL
[9]  
[Anonymous], WATER RESOUR RES
[10]   Effective hydraulic properties of layered soils at the lysimeter scale determined by inverse modelling [J].
Durner, W. ;
Jansen, U. ;
Iden, S. C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 2008, 59 (01) :114-124