Identification of Normal Cranial Sutures in Infants on Routine Magnetic Resonance Imaging

被引:17
作者
Eley, Karen A. [1 ]
Sheerin, Fintan [2 ]
Taylor, Nia [2 ]
Watt-Smith, Stephen R. [3 ]
Golding, Stephen J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Surg Sci, Oxford OX1 2JD, England
[2] Oxford Radcliffe Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Neuroradiol, Oxford, England
[3] Oxford Radcliffe Hosp NHS Trust, Dept Oral & Maxillofacial Surg, Oxford, England
关键词
Cranial suture; magnetic resonance imaging; radiation protection; craniosynostosis; CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS; CT;
D O I
10.1097/SCS.0b013e318275edee
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
There are increasing concerns relating to the ionizing effects of computed tomography imaging in infants with benign conditions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a potential alternative to ionizing radiation when determining patency of the cranial sutures; however, there is no documentation in the literature on the appearance of normal cranial sutures in infants on MRI. This study reviews the appearance of the cranial sutures, their widths, and accuracy of identification in the first year of life on MRI. The coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid sutures were evaluated by 5 assessors on 100 anonymized MRI scans in infants aged 1 to 361 days. The sutures were scored on a 3-point scale. The MRI sequences investigated were axial T1, axial T2, coronal fluid attenuated inversion recovery, axial short tau inversion recovery, and sagittal T1. The suture widths were measured in those cases where they were clearly identifiable, and agreement was obtained in the first aspect of the study (n = 38). A kappa score of 0.6 was obtained for interrater agreement. An increasing total score for all sutures with advancing age was found (P < 0.05). The mean suture widths for the coronal, sagittal, and lambdoid sutures were 1.2 (SD, 0.4), 1.4 (SD, 0.4), and 1.3 (SD, 0.3) mm, respectively. There was no significant difference in suture width with age. The appearance of cranial sutures on MRI is as an area of signal void, which may be difficult to clearly define, thus making it unreliable as a standard investigation in the diagnosis of craniosynostosis.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 320
页数:4
相关论文
共 13 条
  • [1] Radiation exposure from CT in early childhood: a French large-scale multicentre study
    Bernier, M-O
    Rehel, J-L
    Brisse, H. J.
    Wu-Zhou, X.
    Caer-Lorho, S.
    Jacob, S.
    Chateil, J. F.
    Aubert, B.
    Laurier, D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1009) : 53 - 60
  • [2] A population-based study of craniosynostosis in metropolitan Atlanta, 1989-2003
    Boulet, Sheree L.
    Rasmussen, Sonja A.
    Honein, Margaret A.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS PART A, 2008, 146A (08) : 984 - 991
  • [3] Cranial sutures and craniometric points detected on MRI
    Cotton, F
    Rozzi, FR
    Vallee, B
    Pachai, C
    Hermier, M
    Guihard-Costa, AM
    Froment, JC
    [J]. SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2005, 27 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [4] Craniosynostosis
    Johnson, David
    Wilkie, Andrew O. M.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2011, 19 (04) : 369 - 376
  • [5] Craniosynostosis: A Radiological and Surgical Perspective
    Kirmi, Olga
    Lo, Steven J.
    Johnson, David
    Anslow, Philip
    [J]. SEMINARS IN ULTRASOUND CT AND MRI, 2009, 30 (06) : 492 - 512
  • [6] GENETIC-STUDY OF NONSYNDROMIC CORONAL CRANIOSYNOSTOSIS
    LAJEUNIE, E
    LEMERRER, M
    BONAITIPELLIE, C
    MARCHAC, D
    RENIER, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 1995, 55 (04): : 500 - 504
  • [7] Mettler Jr FA, 2000, J RADIOL PROT, V204, P353, DOI DOI 10.1088/0952-4746/20/4/301
  • [8] Normal Sagittal and Coronal Suture Widths by Using CT Imaging
    Mitchell, L. A.
    Kitley, C. A.
    Armitage, T. L.
    Krasnokutsky, M. V.
    Rooks, V. J.
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF NEURORADIOLOGY, 2011, 32 (10) : 1801 - 1805
  • [9] Randolph J., 2008, ONLINE KAPPA CALCULA
  • [10] Sonography of normal cranial sutures
    Soboleski, D
    McCloskey, D
    Mussari, B
    Sauerbrei, E
    Clarke, M
    Fletcher, A
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 168 (03) : 819 - 821