Radioimmunoassay of milk progesterone as a tool for fertility control in smallholder dairy farms

被引:14
作者
Shamsuddin, M
Bhuiyan, MMU [1 ]
Chanda, PK
Alam, MGS
Galloway, D
机构
[1] Bangladesh Agr Univ, Fac Vet Sci, Dept Surg & Obstet, Mymensingh, Bangladesh
[2] Univ Melbourne, Dept Vet Sci, Werribee, Vic 3030, Australia
关键词
cattle; progesterone; non-pregnancy diagnosis; radioimmunoassay; smallholder dairy farm;
D O I
10.1007/s11250-006-4249-z
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
This study focused on the use of radioimmunoassay of progesterone in milk for the diagnosis of post-partum ovarian cyclicity and accurate detection of oestrus and non-pregnancy in cows in the artificial insemination (AI) programme in Bangladesh. In Investigation 1, milk samples were collected on day 0 (day of AI), day 9-13 and day 21-24 from 444 milking cows of various breeds presented for the first post-partum insemination by 413 farmers living at 182 villages/regions in Mymensingh District from 6 AI centres and sub-centres. Each cow was then examined three times after each AI until it stopped returning to oestrus. Sixty to 90 days after the last AI, the cows were examined per rectum to confirm the pregnancy. Milk progesterone data on day 21-24 contributed to a clear diagnosis with respect to non-pregnancy in 100% cows, indicating a possible use of this progesterone assay for identifying non-pregnant cows in AI programmes. In Investigation 2, milk progesterone was monitored two times in a month with a 10-day interval in 88 cows. The samples were taken between 10 days after calving and the first detected oestrus, followed by two more samples 10 days apart. The proportion of cows accurately detected in oestrus was 30%. Another 30% were stated to be in oestrus when they were not (false positive) and 40% were not detected when they were in oestrus (false negative). The mean intervals between calving and oestrus and between calving luteal activity were 40 to 362 days (median = 120, n = 82) and 34 to 398 (median = 111, n = 64) days, respectively. The body condition scores at calving and at the initiation of luteal activity influenced the interval between calving and luteal activity (p < 0.05). Cows suckled twice daily initiated luteal activity earlier than their counterparts suckled several times daily (p < 0.05). Determination of progesterone in milk on day 21-24 is a good means for detecting non-pregnant cows.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 92
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Application of infrared thermal technology to assess the level of heat stress and milk yield reduction of cows in tropical smallholder dairy farms
    Bang, Nguyen N.
    Gaughan, John B.
    Hayes, Ben J.
    Lyons, Russell E.
    McNeill, David M.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (10) : 8454 - 8469
  • [22] Management, productivity and livelihood effects on Kenyan smallholder dairy farms from interventions addressing animal health and nutrition and milk quality
    VanLeeuwen, John A.
    Mellish, Teresa
    Walton, Colleen
    Kaniaru, Ayub
    Gitau, Regina
    Mellish, Ken
    Maina, Bernard
    Wichtel, Jeff
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2012, 44 (02) : 231 - 238
  • [23] Contrasting effects of progesterone on fertility of dairy and beef cows
    Stevenson, J. S.
    Lamb, G. C.
    JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (07) : 5951 - 5964
  • [24] Reliable identification of pregnant dairy cows by double milk progesterone analysis
    Holtz, Wolfgang
    Niggemeyer, Heinrich
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2019, 228 : 38 - 41
  • [25] Genetics of Fertility Indicators Based on Behaviour and Progesterone in Milk
    Lovendahl, P.
    Chagunda, M.
    O'Connell, J.
    Friggens, N.
    CATTLE PRACTICE, 2009, 17 : 7 - 12
  • [26] Accuracy of estimates of milk production per lactation from limited test-day and recall data collected at smallholder dairy farms
    Migose, S. A.
    van der Linden, A.
    Bebe, B. O.
    de Boer, I. J. M.
    Oosting, S. J.
    LIVESTOCK SCIENCE, 2020, 232
  • [27] A questionnaire survey of fertility management on dairy farms in the Republic of Ireland
    Mee, JF
    Moyes, T
    Gleeson, D
    O'Brien, B
    IRISH VETERINARY JOURNAL, 2002, 55 (03) : 122 - 128
  • [28] Spatiosurvival analysis of mortality on smallholder dairy farms in Tanga and Iringa regions of Tanzania
    Phiri, Bernard J.
    Benschop, Jackie
    Stevenson, Mark
    Swai, Emmanuel S.
    Karimuribo, Esron D.
    French, Nigel P.
    TROPICAL ANIMAL HEALTH AND PRODUCTION, 2012, 44 (04) : 827 - 834
  • [29] Aerobic bacterial, coliform, Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus counts of raw and processed milk from selected smallholder dairy farms of Zimbabwe
    Mhone, Tryness A.
    Matope, Gift
    Saidi, Petronella T.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2011, 151 (02) : 223 - 228
  • [30] Perception of farmers about endometritis prevention and control measures for zero-grazed dairy cows on smallholder farms in Rwanda
    Nyabinwa, Pascal
    Kashongwe, Olivier Basole
    Hirwa, Claire d'Andre
    Bebe, Bockline Omedo
    BMC VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2020, 16 (01)