Comparative Evaluation of IV Paracetamol Versus IV Dexmedetomidine in Inpatient Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery: A Double-Blinded Randomized Controlled Study

被引:0
作者
Guru, K. [1 ]
Adinarayanan, S. [1 ]
Krishnan, B. [2 ]
Parida, Satyen [1 ]
Hemavathi, B. [1 ]
Bidkar, Prasanna Udupi [1 ]
Narmadhalakshmi, K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharalal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Pondicherry 605005, India
[2] Jawaharalal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Dent, Pondicherry 605005, India
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; Inpatient; Maxillofacial; Paracetamol; Analgesia; EFFICACY; INJECTION; INFUSION;
D O I
10.1007/s12663-019-01264-3
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose Reconstructive surgeries following fractures in the maxillofacial region often involve considerable bone manipulation, and paracetamol is a commonly used analgesic medication in both intraoperative and postoperative periods. Dexmedetomidine, an alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonist, has both sedative and analgesic properties with minimal cardiorespiratory effects and has been used primarily for its sedative properties in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Aims and Objectives To compare the intraoperative analgesic requirements among patients undergoing oral and maxillofacial surgery who receive IV paracetamol versus IV dexmedetomidine. The time to requirement for the first postoperative analgesic dose and safety and adverse events of both medications were also assessed. Patients and Methods In total, 64 patients needing primary reconstructive surgery for facial fractures were recruited and divided into two groups for this double-blinded study. Patients were randomized to receive a preinduction dose of either IV paracetamol 1 g (Group P) or IV dexmedetomidine 1 mu g/kg (Group D). Sedation scores (Ramsay sedation scale), maximal interincisal distance and pain scores at maximal mouth opening (visual analogue scale) were assessed in both groups just prior to and after the administration of the study drugs. After induction, Group P and Group D received a maintenance dose of normal saline and dexmedetomidine (0.5 mu g/kg/h) during the intraoperative period, respectively. Standard noninvasive cardiorespiratory monitoring was done for the entire duration of surgery. Following extubation, postoperative pain scores and the time to request for first analgesic dose in either group were recorded. Results The time taken to perform the surgery was comparable in both groups. There was a significant difference between the groups in visual analogue scores and interincisal distance after the bolus dose (p < 0.05). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in Group D at around 150 and 175 min of surgery. While the intraoperative fentanyl consumption was comparable in both groups, the time to request for the first analgesic dose in the postoperative period was significantly delayed in Group P (p < 0.05). No adverse cardiopulmonary events were observed in either group. Conclusion The intraoperative anesthetic and analgesic requirements and hemodynamic stability were comparable in IV paracetamol and dexmedetomidine groups. Dexmedetomidine did not confer any enhanced analgesia effect in the postoperative period. More research examining the role of dexmedetomidine for longer duration inpatient oral and maxillofacial surgery is needed.
引用
收藏
页码:394 / 400
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] Prophylactic Antiemetics in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery-A Requiem?
    Alexander, Mohan
    Krishnan, Balasubramanian
    Yuvraj, V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 67 (09) : 1873 - 1877
  • [2] The efficacy of demedetomidine versus morphine for postoperative analgesia after major inpatient surgery
    Arain, SR
    Ruehlow, RM
    Uhrich, TD
    Ebert, TJ
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2004, 98 (01) : 153 - 158
  • [3] Arslan M, 2013, J RES MED SCI, V18, P172
  • [4] Use of Intravenous Acetaminophen in Postoperative Pain Management After Partial and Full Bony Impacted Third Molar Extractions: A Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Trial
    Atencio, Isabel
    Beushausen, Max
    Kowalczyk, John J.
    Flores-Hidalgo, Andres
    Fino, Nora F.
    Baur, Dale A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2018, 76 (07) : 1414 - 1417
  • [5] Dexmedetomidine pharmacodynamics: Part II - Crossover comparison of the analgesic effect of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil in healthy volunteers
    Cortinez, LI
    Hsu, YW
    Sum-Ping, ST
    Young, C
    Keifer, JC
    MacLeod, RD
    Robertson, KM
    Wright, DR
    Moretti, EW
    Somma, J
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2004, 101 (05) : 1077 - 1083
  • [6] Risks and benefits of pre-operative dexmedetomidine in oral and maxillofacial surgeries: a systematic review
    Davoudi, Amin
    Attar, Bijan Movahedian
    Shadmehr, Elham
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2017, 16 (06) : 711 - 720
  • [7] Oliveira CRD, 2017, REV BRAS ANESTESIOL, V67, P72, DOI [10.1016/j.bjane.2015.09.001, 10.1016/j.bjan.2016.10.002]
  • [8] Effect of dexmedetomidine on bleeding during tympanoplasty or septorhinoplasty
    Durmus, M.
    But, A. K.
    Dogan, Z.
    Yucel, A.
    Miman, M. C.
    Ersoy, M. O.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY, 2007, 24 (05) : 447 - 453
  • [9] The effects of increasing plasma concentrations of dexmedetomidine in humans
    Ebert, TJ
    Hall, JE
    Barney, JA
    Uhrich, TD
    Colinco, MD
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2000, 93 (02) : 382 - 394
  • [10] Dexmedetomidine injection into the locus ceruleus produces antinociception
    Guo, TZ
    Jiang, JY
    Buttermann, AE
    Maze, M
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (04) : 873 - 881