Do Sociodemographic Factors Influence Outcome in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy?

被引:6
|
作者
Movsas, Avielle [1 ]
Ibrahim, Ramy [1 ]
Elshaikh, Mohamed A. [1 ]
Lamerato, Lois [2 ]
Lu, Mei [2 ]
Sitarik, Alexandra [2 ]
Pradhan, Deepak [1 ]
Walker, Eleanor M. [1 ]
Stricker, Hans [3 ]
Freytag, Svend O. [1 ]
Chetty, Indrin J. [1 ]
Movsas, Benjamin [1 ]
Siddiqui, Farzan [1 ]
机构
[1] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Radiat Oncol, 2799W Grand Blvd, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[2] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
[3] Henry Ford Hosp, Dept Urol, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
来源
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS | 2016年 / 39卷 / 06期
关键词
sociodemographic; income; race; prostate cancer; radiation dose; DOSE-ESCALATION TRIAL; SOCIOECONOMIC-FACTORS; ANDROGEN SUPPRESSION; RACIAL DISPARITIES; MEN; RADIOTHERAPY; SURVIVAL; IMPACT; MORTALITY; ADENOCARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1097/COC.0000000000000093
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to analyze the prognostic significance of sociodemographic factors on biochemical control (bNED) and overall survival (OS) in patients with prostate cancer. Methods: Prostate cancer patients treated with definitive external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) +/- hormone therapy from 1997 to 2006 were analyzed in this IRB-approved study. Patient demographics, treatment (Tx), and clinical outcome were obtained from electronic medical records. Median household income (mHHI) at the census block group level was obtained from the 2000 census data. Data on disease and Tx parameters included Gleason score, pre-Tx prostate specific antigen (PSA), T stage, year of Tx, EBRT dose, and use of hormone therapy. Patients were categorized as having low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk disease. Sociodemographic factors included age, race, marital status, and mHHI. Biochemical failure was defined as nadir PSA + 2 ng/mL. OS was based on death from any cause. Results: A total of 788 consecutive patients were studied with a median follow-up of 7 years (range, 0.4 to 15 y). African Americans comprised 48% of the patients, whereas 46% of patients were white and 6% were other races. Whites had an average mHHI of $60,190 compared with $36,917 for African Americans (P<0.001). After multivariable modeling, only radiation dose was predictive for bNED (P=0.004) or OS (P=0.008). No sociodemographic factors were predictive for either outcome. Higher radiation dose predicted for better biochemical control and OS. Conclusions: This analysis suggests that sociodemographic factors are not important prognostic factors in determining outcome after EBRT for prostate cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:563 / 567
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) in patients treated with external beam radiation therapy: Evaluation and optimization in patients at higher risk of relapse
    Halverson, Schuyler
    Schipper, Matthew
    Blas, Kevin
    Lee, Vivien
    Sabolch, Aaron
    Olson, Karin
    Sandler, Howard M.
    Feng, Felix Y.
    Hamstra, Daniel A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2011, 101 (03) : 513 - 520
  • [22] Evolution of definitive external beam radiation therapy in the treatment of prostate cancer
    Daly, Tiffany
    WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2020, 38 (03) : 565 - 591
  • [23] Defining biochemical cure for prostate carcinoma patients treated with external beam radiation therapy
    Kestin, LL
    Vicini, FA
    Ziaja, EL
    Stromberg, JS
    Frazier, RC
    Martinez, AA
    CANCER, 1999, 86 (08) : 1557 - 1566
  • [24] Prognostic factors in prostate cancer patients treated by radical external beam radiotherapy
    Garibaldi, Elisabetta
    Gabriele, Domenico
    Maggio, Angelo
    Delmastro, Elena
    Garibaldi, Monica
    Russo, Filippo
    Bresciani, Sara
    Stasi, Michele
    Gabriele, Pietro
    PANMINERVA MEDICA, 2017, 59 (03) : 210 - 220
  • [25] Prognostic Importance of Gleason 7 Disease Among Patients Treated With External Beam Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Results of a Detailed Biopsy Core Analysis
    Spratt, Daniel E.
    Zumsteg, Zach
    Ghadjar, Pirus
    Pangasa, Misha
    Pei, Xin
    Fine, Samson W.
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Kollmeier, Marisa
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2013, 85 (05): : 1254 - 1261
  • [26] The Missing Pieces in Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials of External Beam Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation for Prostate Cancer
    Zaorsky, Nicholas G.
    Egleston, Brian L.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Dicker, Adam P.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Showalter, Timothy N.
    Den, Robert B.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY-CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS, 2016, 39 (04): : 321 - 326
  • [27] An external validation of the Candiolo nomogram in a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated by external-beam radiotherapy
    Gabriele, Domenico
    Guarneri, Alessia
    Bartoncini, Sara
    Munoz, Fernando
    Tamponi, Matteo
    Russo, Filippo
    Stamatakos, Georgios
    Guiot, Caterina
    Regge, Daniele
    Ricardi, Umberto
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [28] Young patients with prostate cancer have an outcome justifying their treatment with external beam radiation
    Freedman, GM
    Hanlon, AL
    Lee, WR
    Hanks, GE
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1996, 35 (02): : 243 - 250
  • [29] Comparative Effectiveness of Radical Prostatectomy Versus External Beam Radiation Therapy Plus Brachytherapy in Patients with High-risk Localized Prostate Cancer
    Berg, Sebastian
    Cole, Alexander P.
    Krimphove, Marieke J.
    Nabi, Junaid
    Marchese, Maya
    Lipsitz, Stuart R.
    Noldus, Joachim
    Choueiri, Toni K.
    Kibel, Adam S.
    Quoc-Dien Trinh
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (04) : 552 - 555
  • [30] Non-cancer mortality in elderly prostate cancer patients treated with combination of radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy
    Wenzel, Mike
    Wurnschimmel, Christoph
    Chierigo, Francesco
    Tian, Zhe
    Shariat, Shahrokh F.
    Terrone, Carlo
    Saad, Fred
    Tilki, Derya
    Graefen, Markus
    Mandel, Philipp
    Kluth, Luis A.
    Chun, Felix K. H.
    Karakiewicz, Pierre I.
    PROSTATE, 2021, 81 (11) : 728 - 735