Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) effects on the harvest and yield of grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor)

被引:61
|
作者
Moore, JW [1 ]
Murray, DS
Westerman, RB
机构
[1] Univ Arkansas, Dept Soil Crop & Environm Sci, Fayetteville, AR 72701 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Plant & Soil Sci, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
competition effects; foreign material; grain grade; grain moisture; grain yield; harvest efficiency; seed loss during harvest; test weight;
D O I
10.1614/WT-02-086
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Field experiments were conducted near Chickasha, OK, in 1999 and 2000 and near Perkins, OK, in 2000 to evaluate the effects of Palmer amaranth on harvest efficiency of grain sorghum and full-season competition with that crop. Weed densities were 0 (the weed-free check), 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 18 plants/15 m of row. In the harvest efficiency experiments, each additional weed per 15 m of row increased grain moisture before cleaning by 0.7 and 0.2% at Chickasha in 1999 and at Perkins, respectively. After cleaning, it increased moisture by 0.2% in both the experiments for each weed. Foreign material increased 67, 2, and 3 kg/ha at Chickasha in 1999, Chickasha in 2000, and Perkins, respectively. At Chickasha in 2000, sorghum seed loss through the combine increased 11 kg/ha for each additional weed per 15 m of row. Grain grades improved at Perkins at higher weed densities. In the. competition experiments, grain yield decreased by 1.8 to 3.5% for each increase of 1 weed/15 m of row. More weeds resulted in higher weed dry weight. Each kilogram of Palmer amaranth dry weight per plot reduced grain yield by 5.3 to 9.1%. In 2000, sorghum seeds per panicle were reduced by 27 to 50 for each weed. Grain grades generally decreased as weed density increased at Chickasha in 2000 but not at Perkins.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 29
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Control and Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) Injury with Pyrasulfotole plus Bromoxynil and Tank Mixtures
    Brandon, Rex E.
    Xue, Qingwu
    Bean, Brent W.
    Blaser, Brock C.
    Bell, Jourdan
    CROP FORAGE & TURFGRASS MANAGEMENT, 2016, 2 (01)
  • [2] Grain Sorghum and Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Response to Herbicide Programs and Agronomic Practices
    Besancon, Thierry E.
    Heiniger, Ronnie W.
    Weisz, Randy
    Everman, Wesley J.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 31 (06) : 781 - 792
  • [3] Control of Atrazine-Resistant Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Double-Crop Grain Sorghum
    Hay, Marshall M.
    Albers, Jeffrey J.
    Dille, J. Anita
    Peterso, Dallas E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2019, 33 (01) : 115 - 122
  • [4] Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri): A Review
    Ward, Sarah M.
    Webster, Theodore M.
    Steckel, Larry E.
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 27 (01) : 12 - 27
  • [5] Impact of palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) on corn (Zea mays) grain yield and yield and quality of forage
    Massinga, RA
    Currie, RS
    WEED TECHNOLOGY, 2002, 16 (03) : 532 - 536
  • [6] Influence of cover crop residue and residual herbicide on emergence dynamics of glyphosate-resistant Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in grain sorghum
    Dhanda, Sachin
    Kumar, Vipan
    Dille, J. Anita
    Obour, Augustine
    Yeager, Elizabeth A.
    Holman, Johnathan
    WEED SCIENCE, 2024, 72 (04) : 387 - 395
  • [7] Impact of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) Removal on Sweetpotato Yield and Quality
    Smith, Stephen
    Jennings, Katie M.
    Nionks, David W.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (09) : S63 - S63
  • [8] Interference of Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) in Sweetpotato
    Meyers, Stephen L.
    Jennings, Katherine M.
    Schultheis, Jonathan R.
    Monks, David W.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2010, 58 (03) : 199 - 203
  • [9] Acclimation of Palmer amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri) to shading
    Jha, Prashant
    Norsworthy, Jason K.
    Riley, Melissa B.
    Bielenberg, Douglas G.
    Bridges, William, Jr.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2008, 56 (05) : 729 - 734
  • [10] Pollen Grain Size, Density, and Settling Velocity for Palmer Amaranth (Amaranthus palmeri)
    Sosnoskie, L. M.
    Webster, T. M.
    Dales, D.
    Rains, G. C.
    Grey, T. L.
    Culpepper, A. S.
    WEED SCIENCE, 2009, 57 (04) : 404 - 409