Transcriptomic reprogramming of barley seminal roots by combined water deficit and salt stress

被引:47
作者
Osthoff, Alina [1 ]
Rose, Petra Dona Dalle [1 ]
Baldauf, Jutta A. [1 ]
Piepho, Hans-Peter [2 ]
Hochholdinger, Frank [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bonn, Inst Crop Sci & Resource Conservat, Crop Funct Genom, D-53113 Bonn, Germany
[2] Univ Hohenheim, Biostat Unit, Inst Crop Sci, D-70599 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
Barley; Combined stress; RNA-Seq; Salt stress; Seminal roots; Transcriptome; Water deficit; HEAT-SHOCK; OSMOTIC-STRESS; DROUGHT; ARABIDOPSIS; EXPRESSION; SALINITY; TOLERANCE; GROWTH; GENES; L;
D O I
10.1186/s12864-019-5634-0
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
BackgroundWater deficit and soil salinity substantially influence plant growth and productivity. When occurring individually, plants often exhibit reduced growth resulting in yield losses. The simultaneous occurrence of these stresses enhances their negative effects. Unraveling the molecular mechanisms of combined abiotic stress responses is essential to secure crop productivity under unfavorable environmental conditions.ResultsThis study examines the effects of water deficit, salinity and a combination of both on growth and transcriptome plasticity of barley seminal roots by RNA-Seq. Exposure to water deficit and combined stress for more than 4 days significantly reduced total seminal root length. Transcriptome sequencing demonstrated that 60 to 80% of stress type-specific gene expression responses observed 6h after treatment were also present after 24h of stress application. However, after 24h of stress application, hundreds of additional genes were stress-regulated compared to the short 6h treatment. Combined salt and water deficit stress application results in a unique transcriptomic response that cannot be predicted from individual stress responses. Enrichment analyses of gene ontology terms revealed stress type-specific adjustments of gene expression. Further, global reprogramming mediated by transcription factors and consistent over-representation of basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factors, heat shock factors (HSF) and ethylene response factors (ERF) was observed.ConclusionThis study reveals the complex transcriptomic responses regulating the perception and signaling of multiple abiotic stresses in barley.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Ahmed IM, 2015, PHYSL MOL BIOCH ASPE, P93
[2]   Genotypic differences in physiological characteristics in the tolerance to drought and salinity combined stress between Tibetan wild and cultivated barley [J].
Ahmed, Imrul Mosaddek ;
Dai, Huaxin ;
Zheng, Weite ;
Cao, Fangbin ;
Zhang, Guoping ;
Sun, Dongfa ;
Wu, Feibo .
PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2013, 63 :49-60
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], AGRICOLAE STAT PROCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2016, FRONT PLANT SCI, DOI [DOI 10.3389/fpls.2016.00114, DOI 10.3389/FPLS.2016.00114]
[6]   Prominent alterations of wild barley leaf transcriptome in response to individual and combined drought acclimation and heat shock conditions [J].
Ashoub, Ahmed ;
Mueller, Niels ;
Jimenez-Gomez, Jose M. ;
Brueggemann, Wolfgang .
PHYSIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2018, 163 (01) :18-29
[7]   Drought and salt tolerance in plants [J].
Bartels, D ;
Sunkar, R .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN PLANT SCIENCES, 2005, 24 (01) :23-58
[8]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[9]   PLANT PRODUCTIVITY AND ENVIRONMENT [J].
BOYER, JS .
SCIENCE, 1982, 218 (4571) :443-448
[10]   Transcriptome dynamics of Arabidopsis during sequential biotic and abiotic stresses [J].
Coolen, Silvia ;
Proietti, Silvia ;
Hickman, Richard ;
Davila Olivas, Nelson H. ;
Huang, Ping-Ping ;
Van Verk, Marcel C. ;
Van Pelt, Johan A. ;
Wittenberg, Alexander H. J. ;
De Vos, Martin ;
Prins, Marcel ;
Van Loon, Joop J. A. ;
Aarts, Mark G. M. ;
Dicke, Marcel ;
Pieterse, Corne M. J. ;
Van Wees, Saskia C. M. .
PLANT JOURNAL, 2016, 86 (03) :249-267