Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging at 1.5 Tesla to assess local recurrence following radical prostatectomy using T2-weighted and contrast-enhanced imaging

被引:142
作者
Cirillo, Stefano [1 ]
Petracchini, Massimo [1 ]
Scotti, Lorenza [2 ]
Gallo, Teresa [1 ]
Macera, Annalisa [1 ]
Bona, Maria Cristina [3 ]
Ortega, Cinzia [4 ]
Gabriele, Pietro [3 ]
Regge, Daniele [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res & Treatment, Radiol Unit, I-10060 Turin, Italy
[2] Univ Milano Bicocca, Dept Stat, Milan, Italy
[3] Inst Canc Res & Treatment, Unit Radiotherapy, I-10060 Turin, Italy
[4] Inst Canc Res & Treatment, Unit Oncol, I-10060 Turin, Italy
关键词
Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostatic neoplasm; Prostatectomy; Local neoplasm recurrence; Contrast media; POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; LYMPH-NODE METASTASES; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE; PROSTATIC-CARCINOMA; BONE-SCINTIGRAPHY; CANCER INCIDENCE; ANTIGEN LEVELS; DISEASE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-008-1174-8
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate diagnostic performance of endorectal magnetic resonance (eMR) for diagnosing local recurrence of prostate cancer (PC) in patients with previous radical prostatectomy (RP) and to assess whether contrast-enhanced (CE)-eMR improved diagnostic accuracy in comparison to unenhanced study. Unenhanced eMR data of 72 male patients (mean of total PSA: 1.23 +/- 1.3 ng/ml) with previous RP were interpreted retrospectively and classified either as normal or suspicious for local recurrence. All eMR examinations were re-evaluated also on CE-eMR 4 months after the first reading. Images were acquired on a 1.5-T system. These data were compared to the standard of reference for local recurrence: prostatectomy bed biopsy results; choline positron emission tomography results; PSA reduction or increase after pelvic radiotherapy; PSA modification during active surveillance. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive positive value, negative predictive value and accuracy were 61.4%, 82.1%, 84.4%, 57.5% and 69.4% for unenhanced eMR and 84.1%, 89.3%, 92.5%, 78.1% and 86.1% for CE-eMR. A statistically significant difference was found between accuracy and sensitivity of the two evaluations (chi(2) = 5.33; p = 0.02 and chi(2) = 9.00; p = 0.0027). EMR had great accuracy for visualizing local recurrence of PC after RP. CE-eMR improved diagnostic performance in comparison with T2-weighted imaging alone.
引用
收藏
页码:761 / 769
页数:9
相关论文
共 42 条
[11]   The prostatic specific antigen era is alive and well: Prostatic specific antigen and biochemical progression following radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Mangold, LA ;
Walsh, PC ;
Partin, AW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (04) :1276-1281
[12]   Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy [J].
Freedland, SJ ;
Sutter, ME ;
Dorey, F ;
Aronson, WJ .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (02) :365-369
[13]   SONOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS OF THE URETHROVESICAL ANASTOMOSIS IN THE EARLY POST-RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY PATIENT [J].
GOLDENBERG, SL ;
CARTER, M ;
DASHEFSKY, S ;
COOPERBERG, PL .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1992, 147 (05) :1307-1309
[14]   Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Zahurak, M ;
Piantadosi, S ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) :517-523
[15]   Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with F-18-fluorocholine for restaging of prostate cancer patients:: Meaningful at PSA < 5 ng/ml? [J].
Heinisch, M ;
Dirisamer, A ;
Loidl, W ;
Stoiber, F ;
Gruy, B ;
Haim, S ;
Langsteger, W .
MOLECULAR IMAGING AND BIOLOGY, 2006, 8 (01) :43-48
[16]   Cancer statistics, 2008 [J].
Jemal, Ahmedin ;
Siegel, Rebecca ;
Ward, Elizabeth ;
Hao, Yongping ;
Xu, Jiaquan ;
Murray, Taylor ;
Thun, Michael J. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2008, 58 (02) :71-96
[17]   Limited value of bone scintigraphy and computed tomography in assessing biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy [J].
Kane, CJ ;
Amling, CL ;
Johnstone, PAS ;
Pak, N ;
Lance, RS ;
Thrasher, JB ;
Foley, JP ;
Riffenburgh, RH ;
Moul, JW .
UROLOGY, 2003, 61 (03) :607-611
[18]   VALUE OF TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND IN IDENTIFYING LOCAL DISEASE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
KAPOOR, DA ;
WASSERMAN, NF ;
ZHANG, G ;
REDDY, PK .
UROLOGY, 1993, 41 (06) :594-597
[19]   Postoperative nomogram for disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Wheeler, TM ;
Scardino, PT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (05) :1499-1507
[20]  
Kotzerke I, 2003, NUKLEARMED-NUCL MED, V42, P25