Rational climate mitigation goals

被引:9
作者
Bjornberg, Karin Edvardsson [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Philosophy, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Climate mitigation; Goal-setting; Rationality; TARGETS; STABILIZATION; RESTORATION; EMISSIONS; SCIENCE; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.057
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The overall goal of the UNFCCC is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. In policy practice, this goal is mainly operationalized through three types of mitigation targets: emission, atmospheric concentration and temperature targets. The typical function of climate mitigation goals is to regulate action towards goal achievement. This is done in several ways. Mitigation goals help the structuring of the greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement action, over time and between agents; they constitute a standard against which GHG abatement can be assessed and evaluated; they motivate climate conscious behavior; and discourage defection from cooperative abatement regimes. Although the three targets clearly relate to one another, there could be differences in how well they fulfill these functions. In this article, the effectiveness of emission, concentration and temperature targets in guiding and motivating action towards the UNFCCC's overall aim is analyzed using a framework for rational goal evaluation developed by Edvardsson and Hansson (2005) as an analytical tool. It is argued that to regulate action effectively, mitigation goals should ideally satisfy four criteria: precision, evaluability, attainability and motivity. Only then can the target fulfill its typical function, i.e., to guide' and motivate action in a way that facilitates goal achievement. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Early science-policy interactions in climate change: lessons from the Advisory Group on Greenhouse Gases [J].
Agrawala, S .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1999, 9 (02) :157-169
[2]  
[Anonymous], KYOTO ADV INT EFFORT
[3]  
[Anonymous], KYOTO ADV INT EFFORT
[4]   Targets for stabilization of atmospheric CO2 [J].
Azar, C ;
Rodhe, H .
SCIENCE, 1997, 276 (5320) :1818-1819
[5]   Discursive stability meets climate instability: A critical exploration of the concept of 'climate stabilization' in contemporary climate policy [J].
Boykoff, Maxwell T. ;
Frame, David ;
Randalls, Samuel .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2010, 20 (01) :53-64
[6]   Promises, promises, ... [J].
Carrillo, Juan D. ;
Dewatripont, Mathias .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2008, 118 (531) :1453-1473
[7]   Climate change:: long-term targets and short-term commitments [J].
Corfee-Morlot, J ;
Höhne, N .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (04) :277-293
[8]  
Dudek D., 2003, CLIM POLICY, V3, pS21
[9]  
EC Council (Council of the European Union), 1996, P 1939 COUNC M ENV B
[10]  
Edvardsson Bjornberg K., 2008, PHILOS CONT WORLD, V15, P139