Rational climate mitigation goals

被引:9
作者
Bjornberg, Karin Edvardsson [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Inst Technol KTH, Div Philosophy, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
Climate mitigation; Goal-setting; Rationality; TARGETS; STABILIZATION; RESTORATION; EMISSIONS; SCIENCE; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.057
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The overall goal of the UNFCCC is to prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. In policy practice, this goal is mainly operationalized through three types of mitigation targets: emission, atmospheric concentration and temperature targets. The typical function of climate mitigation goals is to regulate action towards goal achievement. This is done in several ways. Mitigation goals help the structuring of the greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement action, over time and between agents; they constitute a standard against which GHG abatement can be assessed and evaluated; they motivate climate conscious behavior; and discourage defection from cooperative abatement regimes. Although the three targets clearly relate to one another, there could be differences in how well they fulfill these functions. In this article, the effectiveness of emission, concentration and temperature targets in guiding and motivating action towards the UNFCCC's overall aim is analyzed using a framework for rational goal evaluation developed by Edvardsson and Hansson (2005) as an analytical tool. It is argued that to regulate action effectively, mitigation goals should ideally satisfy four criteria: precision, evaluability, attainability and motivity. Only then can the target fulfill its typical function, i.e., to guide' and motivate action in a way that facilitates goal achievement. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 292
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Focus on the role of forests and soils in meeting climate change mitigation goals: summary
    Moomaw, William R.
    Law, Beverly E.
    Goetz, Scott J.
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (04)
  • [3] Short-lived climate pollutant mitigation and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Haines, Andy
    Amann, Markus
    Borgford-Parnell, Nathan
    Leonard, Sunday
    Kuylenstierna, Johan
    Shindell, Drew
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2017, 7 (12) : 863 - 869
  • [4] IMPACT OF LULUCF ACCOUNTING RULES FOR CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION GOALS: WINNING OR LOSING?
    Kazanaviciute, Vaiva
    Dagiliute, Renata
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING AND LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT, 2023, 31 (03) : 164 - 175
  • [5] Balancing climate and development goals
    Duan, Lei
    Moreno-Cruz, Juan
    Caldeira, Ken
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (12)
  • [6] Climate Warming Mitigation from Nationally Determined Contributions
    Fu, Bo
    Li, Jingyi
    Gasser, Thomas
    Ciais, Philippe
    Piao, Shilong
    Tao, Shu
    Shen, Guofeng
    Lai, Yuqin
    Han, Luchao
    Li, Bengang
    ADVANCES IN ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, 2022, 39 (08) : 1217 - 1228
  • [7] The role of biomass in China's long-term mitigation toward the Paris climate goals
    Pan, Xunzhang
    Chen, Wenying
    Wang, Lining
    Lin, Lu
    Li, Nan
    ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2018, 13 (12):
  • [8] Co-benefits and trade-offs of climate change mitigation actions and the Sustainable Development Goals
    Cohen, Brett
    Cowie, Annette
    Babiker, Mustafa
    Leip, Adrian
    Smith, Pete
    SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION, 2021, 26 : 805 - 813
  • [9] 'Blue Carbon' and the Need to Integrate Mitigation, Adaptation, and Conservation Goals within the International Climate Law Framework
    Bell-James, Justine
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE AND INNOVATION IN INTERNATIONAL LAW, 2018, : 81 - 101
  • [10] Modelling the integrated achievement of clean cooking access and climate mitigation goals: An energy systems optimization approach
    Hollands, A. F.
    Daly, H.
    RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 173