Validation of the 24-item recovery assessment scale-revised (RAS-R) in the Norwegian language and context: a multi-centre study

被引:16
作者
Biringer, Eva [1 ]
Tjoflat, Marit [2 ]
机构
[1] Helse Fonna Local Hlth Author, Dept Res & Innovat, POB 2170, N-5504 Haugesund, Norway
[2] Helse Fonna Local Hlth Author, Folgefonn Community Mental Hlth Ctr, Div Psychiat, Sjukehusvn 14, N-5451 Valen, Norway
关键词
Recovery; Mental health; Psychometric; Validation; Instrument; Assessment; Evaluation; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; SERIOUS MENTAL-ILLNESS; SCHIZOPHRENIA; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12955-018-0849-3
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Recovery Assessment Scale-revised (RAS-R) is a self-report instrument measuring mental health recovery. The purpose of the present study was to translate and adapt the RAS-R into the Norwegian language and to investigate its psychometric properties in terms of factor structure, convergent and discriminant validity and reliability in the Norwegian context. Methods: The present study is a cross-sectional multi-centre study. After a pilot test, the Norwegian version of the RAS-R was distributed to 231 service users in mental health specialist and community services. The factor structure of the instrument was investigated by a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), and internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Results: The RAS-R was found to be acceptable and feasible for service users. The original five-factor structure was confirmed. All model fit indices, including the standardised root mean square residual (SRMR), which is independent of the.2-test, met the criteria for an acceptable model fit. Internal consistencies within sub-scales as measured by Cronbach's alpha ranged from 0.65 to 0.85. Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.90. As expected, some redundancy between factors existed (in particular among the factors Personal confidence and hope, Goal and success orientation and Not dominated by symptoms). Conclusions: The Norwegian RAS-R showed acceptable psychometric properties in terms of convergent validity and reliability, and fit indices from the CFA confirmed the original factor structure. We recommend the Norwegian RAS-R as a tool in service users' and health professionals' collaborative work towards the service users' recovery goals and as an outcome measure in larger evaluations.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   The experience of recovery from schizophrenia: towards an empirically validated stage model [J].
Andresen, R ;
Oades, L ;
Caputi, P .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 37 (05) :586-594
[2]   Do clinical outcome measures assess consumer-defined recovery? [J].
Andresen, Retta ;
Caputi, Peter ;
Oades, Lindsay G. .
PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH, 2010, 177 (03) :309-317
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, BEGINNERS GUIDE STRU
[4]  
Anthony W.A., 1993, Psychosocial Rehabilitation Journal, V16, P11, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0095655
[5]   A recovery-oriented service system: Setting some system level standards [J].
Anthony, WA .
PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION JOURNAL, 2000, 24 (02) :159-168
[6]  
Brown TA, 2006, CONFIRMATORY FACTOR, V455
[7]   Assessing the value of existing recovery measures for routine use in Australian mental health services [J].
Burgess, Philip ;
Pirkis, Jane ;
Coombs, Tim ;
Rosen, Alan .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 45 (04) :267-280
[8]  
Campbell-Orde T., 2005, MEASURING PROMISE CO, VII
[9]   Recovery assessment scale: Examining the factor structure of the German version (RAS-G) in people with schizophrenia spectrum disorders [J].
Cavelti, M. ;
Wirtz, M. ;
Corrigan, P. ;
Vauth, R. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2017, 41 :60-67
[10]   Assessing recovery from schizophrenia as an individual process. A review of self-report instruments [J].
Cavelti, M. ;
Kvrgic, S. ;
Beck, E. -M. ;
Kossowsky, J. ;
Vauth, R. .
EUROPEAN PSYCHIATRY, 2012, 27 (01) :19-32