What Research Ethics Should Learn from Genomics and Society Research: Lessons from the ELSI Congress of 2011

被引:19
作者
Henderson, Gail E. [1 ,2 ]
Juengst, Eric T. [3 ,4 ]
King, Nancy M. P. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ,9 ]
Kuczynski, Kristine
Michie, Marsha [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina Chapel Hill, Dept Social Med, Sch Med, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina Chapel Hill, Ctr Genom & Soc, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] UNC Ctr Bioeth, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[4] Univ N Carolina, Dept Social Med & Genet, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[5] Wake Forest Sch Med, Translat Sci Inst, Winston Salem, NC USA
[6] Wake Forest Sch Med, Wake Forest Inst Regenerat Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[7] Wake Forest Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Winston Salem, NC USA
[8] WFU Ctr Bioeth Hlth & Soc, Winston Salem, NC USA
[9] Wake Forest Univ, Bioeth Program, Winston Salem, NC 27109 USA
关键词
THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; INFORMED-CONSENT; RACE; GENETICS; CRITERIA; BENEFIT; VIEWS; HYPE;
D O I
10.1111/j.1748-720X.2012.00728.x
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Research on the ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of human genomics has devoted significant attention to the research ethics issues that arise from genomic science as it moves through the translational process. Given the prominence of these issues in today's debates over the state of research ethics overall, these studies are well positioned to contribute important data, contextual considerations, and policy arguments to the wider research ethics community's deliberations, and ultimately to develop a research ethics that can help guide biomedicine's future. In this essay, we illustrate this thesis through an analytic summary of the research presented at the 2011 ELSI Congress, an international meeting of genomics and society researchers. We identify three pivotal factors currently shaping genomic research, its clinical translation, and its societal implications: (1) the increasingly blurred boundary between research and treatment; (2) uncertainty that is, the indefinite, indeterminate, and incomplete nature of much genomic information and the challenges that arise from making meaning and use of it; and (3) the role of negotiations between multiple scientific and non-scientific stakeholders in setting the priorities for and direction of biomedical research, as it is increasingly conducted in the public square.
引用
收藏
页码:1008 / 1024
页数:17
相关论文
共 42 条
[41]  
Wolf S. M., 2008, J LAW MED ETHICS, V38, P216
[42]  
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, ETHICAL PRINCIPLES F