Additional value of the ratio of serum total testosterone to total prostate-specific antigen in the diagnosis of prostate cancer in a Chinese population

被引:5
作者
Xu, L. [1 ]
Hu, X. [1 ]
Zhu, Y. [1 ]
Lu, J. [1 ]
Xu, Y. [1 ]
Wang, G. [1 ]
Guo, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Dept Urol, Zhongshan Hosp, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
diagnosis; prostate cancer; prostate-specific antigen; risk assessment; testosterone; ENDOGENOUS SEX-HORMONES; REPLACEMENT THERAPY; RISK; MEN; PSA; PREDICTOR; ASSOCIATION; PREVENTION; DISEASE; MARKER;
D O I
10.1111/and.12872
中图分类号
R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
摘要
We investigated whether serum testosterone and testosterone/prostate-specific antigen ratio (T/PSA) might be prostate cancer (PCa) biomarkers. We retrospectively reviewed 92 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and 164 patients with PCa treated at Zhongshan Hospital, China (April 2012 to November 2013). The BPH and PCa groups had similar serum total testosterone (median, 15.8 versus 16.3nmol/L).Compared with the BPH group, the PCa group had higher PSA (16.8 versus 5.1ng/ml) and lower free/total PSA (9.5% versus 19.3%) and T/PSA (1.37 versus 4.69) (all p<.001).Patients with PCa and PSA 20ng/ml had higher testosterone (17.5 versus 12.9ng/ml; p=.002) and T/PSA (2.24 versus 0.29; p<.001) than those with PSA >20ng/ml. Patients with PCa and Gleason score 7 had higher testosterone (18.3 versus 14.1ng/ml; p=.023) and T/PSA (1.93 versus 0.72; p<.001) than those with Gleason score >7. In patients with PSA 20ng/ml, T/PSA was higher in those with BPH than in those with PCa (4.69 versus 2.24; p<.001). ROC curve analysis yielded an AUC of 0.712; for the optimal cut-off of 4.43, specificity and sensitivity were 52% and 97% respectively. T/PSA may improve the accuracy of PCa diagnosis in patients with a PSA level 20ng/ml.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Alsharef MM, 2012, S AFR J SURG, V50, P40
  • [2] Bashir Muhammad Naeem, 2015, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V16, P5137
  • [3] Testicular and adrenocortical function in men with prostatic cancer and in healthy age-matched controls
    Carlstrom, K
    Stege, R
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 79 (03): : 427 - 431
  • [4] Low pretreatment serum total testosterone is associated with a high incidence of Gleason score 8-10 disease in prostatectomy specimens: data from ethnic Chinese patients with localized prostate cancer
    Dai, Bo
    Qu, YuanYuan
    Kong, YunYi
    Ye, DingWei
    Yao, XuDong
    Zhang, ShiLin
    Wang, ChaoFu
    Zhang, HaiLiang
    Yang, WeiYi
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 110 (11B) : E667 - E672
  • [5] Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012
    Ferlay, Jacques
    Soerjomataram, Isabelle
    Dikshit, Rajesh
    Eser, Sultan
    Mathers, Colin
    Rebelo, Marise
    Parkin, Donald Maxwell
    Forman, David
    Bray, Freddie
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2015, 136 (05) : E359 - E386
  • [6] Prostate Specific Antigen Best Practice Statement: 2009 Update
    Greene, Kirsten L.
    Albertsen, Peter C.
    Babaian, Richard J.
    Carter, H. Ballentine
    Gann, Peter H.
    Han, Misop
    Kuban, Deborah Ann
    Sartor, A. Oliver
    Stanford, Janet L.
    Zietman, Anthony
    Carroll, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 189 (01) : S2 - S11
  • [7] The role of serum testosterone to prostate-specific antigen ratio as a predictor of prostate cancer risk
    Gurbuz, Cenk
    Canat, Lutfi
    Atis, Gokhan
    Guner, Bayram
    Caskurlu, Turhan
    [J]. KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2012, 28 (12) : 649 - 653
  • [8] Is low serum free testosterone a marker for high grade prostate cancer?
    Hoffman, MA
    DeWolf, WC
    Morgentaler, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) : 824 - 827
  • [9] Huggins C, 1972, CA Cancer J Clin, V22, P232, DOI 10.3322/canjclin.22.4.232
  • [10] Testosterone and Prostate Cancer: Revisiting Old Paradigms
    Isbarn, Hendrik
    Pinthus, Jehonathan H.
    Marks, Leonard S.
    Montorsi, Francesco
    Morales, Alvaro
    Morgentaler, Abraham
    Schulman, Claude
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 56 (01) : 48 - 56