A multi-criteria decision analysis approach for importance identification and ranking of network components

被引:37
作者
Almoghathawi, Yasser [1 ,2 ]
Barker, Kash [1 ]
Rocco, Claudio M. [3 ]
Nicholson, Charles D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oklahoma, Sch Ind & Syst Engn, Norman, OK 73019 USA
[2] King Fahd Univ Petr & Minerals, Dept Syst Engn, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia
[3] Cent Univ Venezuela, Bolivarian, Venezuela
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Network; Vulnerability; Flow; Importance measures; MCDM; TOPSIS; VULNERABILITY ANALYSIS; TRANSPORTATION; MODEL; TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; LINKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.007
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Analyzing network vulnerability is a key element of network planning in order to be prepared for any disruptive event that might impact the performance of the network. Hence, many importance measures have been proposed to identify the important components in a network with respect to vulnerability and rank them accordingly based on individual importance measure. However, in this paper, we propose a new approach to identify the most important network components based on multiple importance measures using a multi criteria decision making (MCDM) method, namely the technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS), able to take into account the preferences of decision-makers. We consider multiple edge-specific flow based importance measures provided as the multiple criteria of a network where the alternatives are the edges. Accordingly, TOPSIS is used to rank the edges of the network based on their importance considering multiple different importance measures. The proposed approach is illustrated through different networks with different densities along with the effects of weighs.
引用
收藏
页码:142 / 151
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   Ranking Using the Copeland Score: A Comparison with the Hasse Diagram [J].
Al-Sharrah, Ghanima .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2010, 50 (05) :785-791
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1956, Canadian Journal of Mathematics, DOI 10.4153/CJM-1956-045-5
[3]   Performance measurement model for Turkish aviation firms using the rough-AHP and TOPSIS methods under fuzzy environment [J].
Aydogan, Emel Kizilkaya .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2011, 38 (04) :3992-3998
[4]  
Bazaraa M., 2011, LINEAR PROGRAMMING N
[5]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[6]   A multiobjective optimization framework for multicontaminant industrial water network design [J].
Boix, Marianne ;
Montastruc, Ludovic ;
Pibouleau, Luc ;
Azzaro-Pantel, Catherine ;
Domenech, Serge .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2011, 92 (07) :1802-1808
[7]   The Evaluation of Renewable Energy Technologies for Electricity Generation in Turkey Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy TOPSIS [J].
Boran, F. E. ;
Boran, K. ;
Menlik, T. .
ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2012, 7 (01) :81-90
[8]   Personnel Selection Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets [J].
Boran, Fatih Emre ;
Genc, Serkan ;
Akay, Diyar .
HUMAN FACTORS AND ERGONOMICS IN MANUFACTURING & SERVICE INDUSTRIES, 2011, 21 (05) :493-503
[9]  
Brans J. P., 1984, OPERATIONAL RES
[10]   A PREFERENCE RANKING ORGANIZATION METHOD - (THE PROMETHEE METHOD FOR MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MAKING) [J].
BRANS, JP ;
VINCKE, PH .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1985, 31 (06) :647-656