Development of the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice Tool Advancing Frontline Nursing Practice

被引:9
作者
Tschannen, Dana [1 ]
Alexander, Catherine [2 ]
Tovar, Elizabeth G. [3 ]
Ghosh, Bidisha [4 ]
Zellefrow, Cindy [5 ,6 ]
Milner, Kerry A. [7 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Sch Nursing, 400 N Ingalls,Room 4152, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock, Dept Community & Family Med, Lebanon, NH USA
[3] Univ Kentucky, Coll Nursing, Lexington, KY USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[5] Helene Fuld Hlth Trust Natl Inst Evidence Based P, Columbus, OH USA
[6] Ohio State Univ, Coll Nursing, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[7] Sacred Heart Univ, Davis & Henley Coll Nursing, Fairfield, CT USA
关键词
nurse engagement in quality improvement; nursing; quality improvement; quality improvement competencies; tool development; TRANSFORMING CARE; SAFETY EDUCATION; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000457
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Background: Frontline nurse engagement in quality improvement (QI) improves nurse-sensitive outcomes; yet research suggests frontline nurses are not engaging in QI. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop, refine, and psychometrically evaluate the Nursing Quality Improvement in Practice (N-QuIP) tool to measure nurses' competency, engagement, and barriers/facilitators to QI engagement. Methods: Item development was guided by an expert panel and literature review. Factor analysis and reliability indices were assessed through 681 surveys completed by nurses at one medical center. Results: Cronbach alpha coefficients were 0.97 (Skill Scale) and 0.90 (Attitude Scale). Kuder-Richardson Formula 20 (KR-20) for knowledge was 0.36. Exploratory factor analysis identified 4 (Skill) and 3 (Attitude) subscales respectively, aligning well with QI competencies. Conclusions: Preliminary data suggest that the N-QuIP is a valid and reliable tool for assessing nurse QI competence and engagement. Understanding current knowledge, skills, and attitudes and identified barriers/facilitators can help the development of strategies aimed at increasing QI engagement.
引用
收藏
页码:372 / 379
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] Measure, learn, and improve: Physicians' involvement in quality improvement
    Audet, AMJ
    Doty, MM
    Shamasdin, J
    Schoenbaum, SC
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2005, 24 (03) : 843 - 853
  • [2] The Appraisal of Nursing Practice Instrument Development and Initial Testing
    Becker, Heather
    Meraviglia, Marty
    Seo, Jin
    Ndlovu, Chipo
    Kimmel, Lois
    Rowin, Toni
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING ADMINISTRATION, 2018, 48 (01): : 44 - 49
  • [3] Quality and safety education for nurses
    Cronenwett, Linda
    Sherwood, Gwen
    Bornsteiner, Jane
    Disch, Joanne
    Johnson, Jean
    Mitchell, Pamela
    Sullivan, Dori Taylor
    Warren, Judith
    [J]. NURSING OUTLOOK, 2007, 55 (03) : 122 - 131
  • [4] Quality and safety education for advanced nursing practice
    Cronenwett, Linda
    Sherwood, Gwen
    Pohl, Joanne
    Barnsteiner, Jane
    Moore, Shirley
    Sullivan, Dori Taylor
    Ward, Deborah
    Warren, Judith
    [J]. NURSING OUTLOOK, 2009, 57 (06) : 338 - 348
  • [5] Early-Career Registered Nurses' Participation in Hospital Quality Improvement Activities
    Djukic, Maja
    Kovner, Christine T.
    Brewer, Carol S.
    Fatehi, Farida K.
    Bernstein, Ilya
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NURSING CARE QUALITY, 2013, 28 (03) : 198 - 207
  • [6] Draper DA, 2008, NEPHROL NURS J, V35, P431
  • [7] The quality improvement attitude survey: Development and preliminary psychometric characteristics
    Dunagan, Pamela B.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2017, 26 (23-24) : 5113 - 5120
  • [8] Dycus Paula, 2009, Qual Manag Health Care, V18, P202, DOI 10.1097/QMH.0b013e3181aea256
  • [9] Institute of Medicine (US) Committee on the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Initiative on the Future of Nursing at the Institute of Medicine, 2011, FUT NURS LEAD CHANG
  • [10] Measuring Quality Improvement in Public Health: The Development and Psychometric Testing of a QI Maturity Tool
    Joly, Brenda M.
    Booth, Maureen
    Mittal, Prashant
    Shaler, George
    [J]. EVALUATION & THE HEALTH PROFESSIONS, 2012, 35 (02) : 119 - 147