Enhancing cognitive control components of insight problems solving by anodal tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

被引:130
作者
Metuki, Nili [1 ]
Sela, Tal [1 ]
Lavidor, Michal [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Bar Ilan Univ, Dept Psychol, IL-52900 Ramat Gan, Israel
[2] Univ Hull, Dept Psychol, Kingston Upon Hull HU6 7RX, N Humberside, England
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Insight problems; Semantic processing; Cognitive control; tDCS; DLPFC; FRONTAL EEG ASYMMETRY; BEHAVIORAL ACTIVATION; NEURAL ACTIVITY; INHIBITION; STIMULATION; ENHANCEMENT; MEMORY; REWARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.brs.2012.03.002
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Executive functions play a vital role in semantic processing. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over frontal regions associated with cognitive control has been found to enhance verbal insight problem solving. The aim of the current study was to extend our understanding of the cognitive control processes modulating verbal insight problem solving. Hypotheses: Anodal stimulation over the left Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) was predicted to improve performance in solving insight problems. Particularly, it was expected that this effect would be focused on solution recognition, which is hypothesized to be directly related to control processes, and would be more pronounced for difficult problems, hypothesized to require more cognitive demand. Moreover, we predicted that this effect would be modulated by approach motivation tendencies, due to cognition and motivation interactions in the DLPFC. Methods: 21 participants performed a verbal insight problem task twice, once under active anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC and once under sham stimulation, with a one week interval between sessions. Participants had 7 s to generate a solution for each problem, and then were requested to indicate whether a target word was the correct solution or not. Results: Stimulation significantly enhanced solution recognition for difficult problems. This effect was modulated by trait motivation, i.e. was larger for participants with lower approach motivation. No effects were found for easy problems, or solution generation. Conclusions: Left DLPFC executive control modulates semantic processing of verbal insight problems. The observed synergy between language, cognition and motivation carries theoretical implication as well as practical consideration for future stimulation research. (c) 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 115
页数:6
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, HDB PERSONALITY THEO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY ANXI
[3]   Selection, integration, and conflict monitoring: Assessing the nature and generality of prefrontal cognitive control mechanisms [J].
Badre, D ;
Wagner, AD .
NEURON, 2004, 41 (03) :473-487
[4]   Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMIRI [J].
Banich, MT ;
Milham, MP ;
Atchley, RA ;
Cohen, NJ ;
Webb, A ;
Wszalek, T ;
Kramer, AF ;
Liang, ZP ;
Barad, V ;
Gullett, D ;
Shah, C ;
Brown, C .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 10 (1-2) :1-9
[5]   The right hemisphere maintains solution-related activation for yet-to-be-solved problems [J].
Beeman, MJ ;
Bowden, EM .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2000, 28 (07) :1231-1241
[6]   Approaching the Bad and Avoiding the Good: Lateral Prefrontal Cortical Asymmetry Distinguishes between Action and Valence [J].
Berkman, Elliot T. ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 22 (09) :1970-1979
[7]   Methods for investigating the neural components of insight [J].
Bowden, Edward M. ;
Jung-Beeman, Mark .
METHODS, 2007, 42 (01) :87-99
[8]   Getting the right idea: Semantic activation in the right hemisphere may help solve insight problems [J].
Bowden, EM ;
Beeman, MJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (06) :435-440
[9]   New approaches to demystifying insight [J].
Bowden, EM ;
Jung-Beeman, M ;
Fleck, J ;
Kounios, J .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2005, 9 (07) :322-328
[10]   Aha! - Insight experience correlates with solution activation in the right hemisphere [J].
Bowden, EM ;
Jung-Beeman, M .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 2003, 10 (03) :730-737