Enabling Participatory Planning After Disasters: A Case Study of the World Bank's Housing Reconstruction in Turkey

被引:85
作者
Ganapati, N. Emel [1 ]
Ganapati, Sukumar [1 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Publ Adm, Inst Housing & Community Dev, Miami, FL 33199 USA
关键词
public participation; disaster recovery; planning; World Bank; earthquake; Turkey; PUBLIC-PARTICIPATION; CITIZEN PARTICIPATION; CIVIL-SOCIETY; UNITED-STATES; COMMUNITIES; RECOVERY; INSTITUTIONS; EARTHQUAKE; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1080/01944360802546254
中图分类号
TU98 [区域规划、城乡规划];
学科分类号
0814 ; 082803 ; 0833 ;
摘要
Problem: Literature emphasizes that the public should participate in the planning of postdisaster recovery, but several challenges impede such participation. Purpose: This article examines what hindered public participation in a particular housing reconstruction project and suggests how planners can better enable public participation in planning after disasters. Methods: The article is based on a case study of a housing reconstruction project sponsored by the World Bank in the Sirinkoy neighborhood of the city of Golcuk in northwestern Turkey after the August 17, 1999, earthquake. In addition to reviewing secondary sources, our primary data collection methods for the case study included onsite participant observation and conducting in-depth semistructured interviews and a focus group. Results and conclusions: The case demonstrates that the World Bank defined the public in public participation narrowly, only seeking participation from project beneficiaries and excluding such relevant local stakeholders as the local government and community-based organizations. This occurred because the World Bank took a project-based approach and had limited knowledge of local capacities. Even the feedback received from project beneficiaries was not incorporated into the housing plans due to World Bank's sense of urgency, concern for cost effectiveness, and inflexible terms and conditions of the loan. Takeaway for practice: Planners and policymakers should broaden the definition of public in public participation in postdisaster housing projects. Rather than focusing narrowly on project beneficiaries, they should include other stakeholders in the broader urban development process. They should also put people before plans in postdisaster housing reconstruction, giving disaster victims a real chance to have a say in planning processes and outcomes. Research support: This research was supported in part by the John Randolph Haynes and Dora Haynes Foundation Doctoral Dissertation Fellowship.
引用
收藏
页码:41 / 59
页数:19
相关论文
共 118 条
[41]  
Gurenko Eugene., 2006, Earthquake Insurance in Turkey: history of the Turkish Catastrophe Pool
[42]  
Haas J.E., 1977, RECONSTRUCTION FOLLO
[43]   Political science and the three new institutionalisms [J].
Hall, PA ;
Taylor, RCR .
POLITICAL STUDIES, 1996, 44 (05) :936-957
[44]   The paradox of participation and the hidden role of information -: A case study [J].
Hanna, KS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION, 2000, 66 (04) :398-410
[45]  
Healey P.:., 1992, Town planning review, V63, P143, DOI [DOI 10.3828/TPR.63.2.422X602303814821, 10.3828/tpr.63.2.422x602303814821]
[46]  
Healey Pasty., 2006, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies, V2nd
[47]  
Healey Patsy., 2007, Institutions and Planning, P61
[48]   The limits to communicative planning [J].
Huxley, M .
JOURNAL OF PLANNING EDUCATION AND RESEARCH, 2000, 19 (04) :369-377
[49]   Institutions, routines, and crises - Post-earthquake housing recovery in Mexico City and Los Angeles [J].
Inam, A .
CITIES, 1999, 16 (06) :391-407
[50]  
Inam Aseem., 2005, PLANNING UNPLANNED R