Seeing It from Both Sides: Do Approaches to Involving Patients in Improving Their Safety Risk Damaging the Trust between Patients and Healthcare Professionals? An Interview Study

被引:42
作者
Hrisos, Susan [1 ]
Thomson, Richard [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Inst Hlth & Soc, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 11期
关键词
DECISION-MAKING; ERROR PREVENTION; MEDICAL ERRORS; PARTICIPATION; INVOLVEMENT; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; VIEWS; INFORMATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0080759
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objective: Encouraging patients to be more vigilant about their care challenges the traditional dynamics of patient-healthcare professional interactions. This study aimed to explore, from the perspectives of both patients and frontline healthcare staff, the potential consequences of patient-mediated intervention as a way of pushing safety improvement through the involvement of patients. Design: Qualitative study, using purposive sampling and semi-structured interviews with patients, their relatives and healthcare professionals. Emergent themes were identified using grounded theory, with data coded using NVIVO 8. Participants: 16 patients, 4 relatives, (mean age (sd) 60 years (15); 12 female, 8 male) and 39 healthcare professionals, (9 pharmacists, 11 doctors, 12 nurses, 7 health care assistants). Setting: Participants were sampled from general medical and surgical wards, taking acute and elective admissions, in two hospitals in north east England. Results: Positive consequences were identified but some actions encouraged by current patient-mediated approaches elicited feelings of suspicion and mistrust. For example, patients felt speaking up might appear rude or disrespectful, were concerned about upsetting staff and worried that their care might be compromised. Staff, whilst apparently welcoming patient questions, appeared uncertain about patients' motives for questioning and believed that patients who asked many questions and/or who wrote things down were preparing to complain. Behavioural implications were identified that could serve to exacerbate patient safety problems (e. g. staff avoiding contact with inquisitive patients or relatives; patients avoiding contact with unreceptive staff). Conclusions: Approaches that aim to push improvement in patient safety through the involvement of patients could engender mistrust and create negative tensions in the patient-provider relationship. A more collaborative approach, that encourages patients and healthcare staff to work together, is needed. Future initiatives should aim to shift the current focus away from "checking up" on individual healthcare professionals to one that engages both parties in the common goal of enhancing safety.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2006, INTERPRETING QUALITA
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2012, NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2010, IND INQ CAR PROV MID
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, IN GOV RESP REP MIDS
  • [6] Patient safety: Views of practicing physicians and the public on medical errors
    Blendon, RJ
    DesRoches, CM
    Brodie, M
    Benson, JM
    Rosen, AB
    Schneider, E
    Altman, DE
    Zapert, K
    Herrmann, MJ
    Steffenson, AE
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 347 (24) : 1933 - 1940
  • [7] Physician-patient relationship in the intensive care unit: Erosion of the sacred trust?
    Chaitin, E
    Stiller, R
    Jacobs, S
    Hershl, J
    Grogen, T
    Weinberg, J
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2003, 31 (05) : S367 - S372
  • [8] Patient safety: what role can patients play?
    Coulter, Angela
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2006, 9 (03) : 205 - 206
  • [9] Consent to transfusion: patients' and healthcare professionals' attitudes towards the provision of blood transfusion information
    Davis, R.
    Vincent, C.
    Sud, A.
    Noel, S.
    Moss, R.
    Asgheddi, M.
    Abdur-Rahman, I.
    Murphy, M.
    [J]. TRANSFUSION MEDICINE, 2012, 22 (03) : 167 - 172
  • [10] Davis R, 2008, PATIENT INVOLVEMENT