Building programme theory to develop more adaptable and scalable complex interventions: Realist formative process evaluation prior to full trial

被引:36
作者
Brand, Sarah Louise [1 ]
Quinn, Cath [2 ]
Pearson, Mark [3 ]
Lennox, Charlotte [4 ]
Owens, Christabel [3 ]
Kirkpatrick, Tim [2 ]
Callaghan, Lynne [2 ]
Stirzaker, Alex [6 ]
Michie, Susan [7 ,8 ]
Maguire, Mike [1 ]
Shaw, Jennifer [5 ]
Byng, Richard [2 ]
机构
[1] Cardiff Univ, Cardiff, S Glam, Wales
[2] Plymouth Univ, Plymouth, Devon, England
[3] Univ Exeter, Sch Med, Exeter, Devon, England
[4] Univ Manchester, Forens Psychol, Manchester, Lancs, England
[5] Univ Manchester, Forens Psychiat, Manchester, Lancs, England
[6] NHS Trust, Bolton, England
[7] UCL, Hlth Psychol, London, England
[8] UCL, Ctr Behav Change, London, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
complex intervention development; feasibility and piloting; formative process evaluation; programme theory development; realist evaluation;
D O I
10.1177/1356389018802134
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Medical Research Council guidelines recognise the need to optimise complex interventions prior to full trial through greater understanding of underlying theory and formative process evaluation, yet there are few examples. A realist approach to formative process evaluation makes a unique contribution through a focus on theory formalisation and abstraction. The success of an intervention is dependent on the extent to which it gels or jars with existing provision and can be successfully transferred to new contexts. Interventions with underlying programme theory about how they work, for whom, and under which circumstances will be better able to adapt to work with (rather than against) different services, individuals, and settings. In this methodological article, we describe and illustrate how a realist approach to formative process evaluation develops contextualised intervention theory that can underpin more adaptable and scalable interventions. We discuss challenges and benefits of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 170
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES
[2]  
[Anonymous], PILOT FEASIBILITY ST
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1994, QUALITATIVE RES COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DOING REALIST RES
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2014, The science of evaluation: a realist manifesto
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2012, NVIVO QUALITATIVE DA
[7]  
[Anonymous], DURHAM REMAND STUDY
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2018, DOING REALIST RES
[9]  
Bhaskar R., 2013, REALIST THEORY SCI
[10]   Are randomised controlled trials positivist? Reviewing the social science and philosophy literature to assess positivist tendencies of trials of social interventions in public health and health services [J].
Bonell, Chris ;
Moore, Graham ;
Warren, Emily ;
Moore, Laurence .
TRIALS, 2018, 19