Closed-loop identification revisited

被引:477
|
作者
Forssell, U [1 ]
Ljung, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Linkoping Univ, Dept Elect Engn, Div Automat Control, S-58183 Linkoping, Sweden
关键词
system identification; closed-loop identification; prediction error methods; modelling; statistical analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00022-9
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Identification of systems operating in closed loop has long been of prime interest in industrial applications. The problem offers many possibilities, and also some fallacies, and a wide variety of approaches have been suggested, many quite recently. The purpose of the current contribution is to place most of these approaches in a coherent framework, thereby showing their connections and display similarities and differences in the asymptotic properties of the resulting estimates. The common framework is created by the basic prediction error method, and it is shown that most of the common methods correspond to different parameterizations of the dynamics and noise models. The so-called indirect methods, e.g., are indeed "direct" methods employing noise models that contain the regulator. The asymptotic properties of the estimates then follow from the general theory and take different forms as they are translated to the particular parameterizations. We also study a new projection approach to closed-loop identification with the advantage of allowing approximation of the open-loop dynamics in a given, and user-chosen frequency domain norm, even in the case of an unknown, nonlinear regulator. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1215 / 1241
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Bounded-error identification for closed-loop systems
    Pouliquen, Mathieu
    Gehan, Olivier
    Pigeon, Eric
    AUTOMATICA, 2014, 50 (07) : 1884 - 1890
  • [42] Closed-loop identification method for servo elastic load
    Zheng L.-K.
    Wu Y.-X.
    Wang X.-H.
    Huang Q.-S.
    Kongzhi Lilun Yu Yingyong/Control Theory and Applications, 2023, 40 (03): : 468 - 476
  • [43] Closed-loop subspace identification using the parity space
    Wang, J
    Qin, SJ
    AUTOMATICA, 2006, 42 (02) : 315 - 320
  • [44] Identification of Normalised Coprime Plant Factors from Closed-loop Experimental Data
    Van den Hof, Paul M. J.
    Schrama, Ruud J. P.
    de Callafon, Raymond A.
    Bosgra, Okko H.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 1995, 1 (01) : 62 - 74
  • [45] An application-oriented approach to dual control with excitation for closed-loop identification
    Larsson, Christian A.
    Ebadat, Afrooz
    Rojas, Cristian R.
    Bombois, Xavier
    Hjalmarsson, Hakan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2016, 29 : 1 - 16
  • [46] Closed-Loop MISO Identification of Propofol Effect on Blood Pressure and Depth of Hypnosis
    van Heusden, Klaske
    Yousefi, Mahdi
    Ansermino, J. Mark
    Dumont, Guy A.
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON CONTROL SYSTEMS TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 28 (01) : 254 - 263
  • [47] A virtual closed loop method for closed loop identification
    Agueero, Juan C.
    Goodwin, Graham C.
    Van den Hof, Paul M. J.
    AUTOMATICA, 2011, 47 (08) : 1626 - 1637
  • [48] Instrumental variable scheme for closed-loop LPV model identification
    Toth, Roland
    Laurain, Vincent
    Gilson, Marion
    Garnier, Hugues
    AUTOMATICA, 2012, 48 (09) : 2314 - 2320
  • [49] Consistency analysis of some closed-loop subspace identification methods
    Chiuso, A
    Picci, G
    AUTOMATICA, 2005, 41 (03) : 377 - 391
  • [50] Probabilistic Invariant Sets for Closed-Loop Re-Identification
    Anderson, A.
    Ferramosca, A.
    Gonzalez, A. H.
    Kofman, E.
    IEEE LATIN AMERICA TRANSACTIONS, 2016, 14 (06) : 2744 - 2751