Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor

被引:110
作者
Desai, MM [1 ]
Aron, M [1 ]
Gill, IS [1 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Glickman Urol Inst, Sect Laparoscop & Robot Surg, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2005.06.114
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
We sought to compare perioperative and short-term outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation in patients with peripheral small renal tumors. Prospectively accrued data of patients with a small renal tumor (<= 3 cm) undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (group 1, n = 153) or laparoscopic cryoablation (group 2, n = 78) were compared retrospectively. Patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy were younger (mean age, 60.6 vs 65.6 years; P = 0.005), healthier (American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3/4 present in 46% vs 75%; P = 0.001), had a lower baseline serum creatinine (90.1 vs 106.0 mu mol/L [1.02 vs 1.2 mg/dL]; P = 0.01), a larger tumor size (2.3 vs 2.1 cm; P = 0.02), and fewer cases of solitary kidneys (5% vs 23%; P = 0.000). Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy was associated with greater blood loss (211 vs 101 mL; P = 0.000) and a higher incidence of delayed complications after hospital discharge (16.3% vs 2.2%; P = 0.01) compared with cryoablation. Both groups were comparable with regard to operative time (P = 0.77), intraoperative complications (P = 0.1), postoperative complications (P = 0.55), hospital stay (P = 0.13), convalescence (P = 0.96), and postoperative serum creatinine (112.2 vs 123.7 mu mol/L [1.27 vs 1.4 mg/dL]; P = 0.31). Local recurrence was detected over a mean follow-up time of 5.8 months in group 1 (0.6%) and 24.6 months in group 2 (3%). Although the technical simplicity, decreased blood loss, and somewhat lower complication rate are attractive features of renal cryotherapy, this must be balanced against the current lack of long-term follow-up data that are needed to confirm the oncologic adequacy of this developmental procedure. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy, albeit a technically advanced procedure, duplicates established open principles and has therefore evolved to become our current minimally invasive nephron-sparing procedure of choice in the majority of patients with a small renal tumor.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 7 条
[1]   Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: Evaluation of long-term oncological outcome [J].
Allaf, ME ;
Bhayani, SB ;
Rogers, C ;
Varkarakis, I ;
Link, RE ;
Inagaki, T ;
Jarrett, TW ;
Kavoussi, LR .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 172 (03) :871-873
[2]   Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year followup [J].
Fergany, AF ;
Hafez, KS ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (02) :442-445
[3]   Laparoscopic heminephrectomy for tumor [J].
Finelli, A ;
Gill, IS ;
Desai, MM ;
Tan, YH ;
Moinzadeh, A ;
Singh, D ;
Kaouk, JH .
UROLOGY, 2005, 65 (03) :473-478
[4]   Renal cryoablation: Outcome at 3 years [J].
Gill, IS ;
Remer, EM ;
Hasan, WA ;
Strzempkowski, B ;
Spaliviero, M ;
Steinberg, AP ;
Kaouk, JH ;
Desai, MM ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 173 (06) :1903-1907
[5]   Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients [J].
Gill, IS ;
Matin, SF ;
Desai, MM ;
Kaouk, JH ;
Steinberg, A ;
Mascha, E ;
Thornton, J ;
Sherief, MH ;
Strzempkowski, B ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (01) :64-68
[6]  
Lau WKO, 2000, MAYO CLIN PROC, V75, P1236
[7]   Surgical management of renal tumors 4 cm. or less in a contemporary cohort [J].
Lee, CT ;
Katz, J ;
Shi, WJ ;
Thaler, HT ;
Reuter, VE ;
Russo, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 163 (03) :730-736