Single-Center Experience in Systemic Stress and Short-Term Morbidity of Single-Incision Cholecystectomy

被引:6
作者
Froghi, Farid [2 ]
Sodergren, Mikael H. [1 ,2 ]
Wright, Victoria J. [2 ]
Coomber, Ross [2 ]
Courtney, Alan P.
Darzi, Ara [2 ]
Paraskeva, Paraskevas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Dept Biosurg & Surg Technol, Acad Surg Unit, St Marys Hosp, London W2 1NY, England
[2] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, London W2 1NY, England
关键词
SILS; single-incision surgery; systemic stress; cholecystectomy; single-site surgery; ACUTE-PHASE RESPONSE; C-REACTIVE PROTEIN; LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY; HOST-DEFENSE; SURGERY; INTERLEUKIN-6; INFECTION; LEVEL; IL-6;
D O I
10.1177/1553350611420453
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) aims to reduce the number and size of skin incisions. The authors compared systemic stress and perioperative outcome of SILS and laparoscopic (LAP) cholecystectomy. Twenty-nine subjects (8 males and 21 females; mean age = 47 years; mean body mass index = 27) were included in the study. There was no statistical difference in mean operative time (LAP = 89 minutes; SILS = 113 minutes; P = ns), and no intraoperative complications were reported. There were no statistically significant differences observed in white cell count, C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha between SILS and LAP groups. The mean hospital length of stay (LAP = 1.8 days; SILS = 1.4 days) and Visual Analogue Scale scores for pain at 6 hours (LAP = 5.14; SILS = 4.46) and 24 hours (LAP = 3.9; SILS = 2.815) were similar with no perioperative morbidity. These results suggest that the systemic stress response in LAP and SILS cholecystectomy does not appear to be significantly different. SILS cholecystectomy appears safe with no perioperative morbidity or complications encountered in this series.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 122
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
ARONSEN KF, 1972, SCAND J CLIN LAB I S, V124, P127
[2]  
BELFRAGE S, 1963, Acta Med Scand Suppl, V395, P1
[3]   LAPAROSCOPIC VERSUS OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - HOSPITALIZATION, SICK LEAVE, ANALGESIA AND TRAUMA RESPONSES [J].
BERGGREN, U ;
GORDH, T ;
GRAMA, D ;
HAGLUND, U ;
RASTAD, J ;
ARVIDSSON, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 81 (09) :1362-1365
[4]   Minimal access surgery for cholelithiasis induces an attenuated acute phase response [J].
Bruce, DM ;
Smith, M ;
Walker, CBJ ;
Heys, SD ;
Binnie, NR ;
Gough, DB ;
Broom, J ;
Eremin, O .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 178 (03) :232-234
[5]   Comparative evaluation of the inflammatory mediators in patients undergoing laparoscopic versus conventional cholecystectomy [J].
Chaudhary, D ;
Verma, GR ;
Gupta, R ;
Bose, SM ;
Ganguly, NK .
AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1999, 69 (05) :369-372
[6]   Single-incision laparoscopic surgery for cholecystectomy: an evolving technique [J].
Chow, Andre ;
Purkayastha, Sanjay ;
Aziz, Omer ;
Paraskeva, Paraskevas .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2010, 24 (03) :709-714
[7]   Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery (SILS) in General Surgery A Review of Current Practice [J].
Froghi, Farid ;
Sodergren, Mikael Hans ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Paraskeva, Paraskevas .
SURGICAL LAPAROSCOPY ENDOSCOPY & PERCUTANEOUS TECHNIQUES, 2010, 20 (04) :191-204
[8]   Systemic acute-phase response after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy [J].
Grande, M ;
Tucci, GF ;
Adorisio, O ;
Barini, A ;
Rulli, F ;
Neri, A ;
Franchi, F ;
Farinon, AM .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (02) :313-316
[9]  
HALEVY A, 1995, SURG ENDOSC-ULTRAS, V9, P280
[10]   Length of laparotomy incision and surgical stress assessed by serum IL-6 level [J].
Ishibashi, S ;
Takeuchi, H ;
Fujii, K ;
Shiraishi, N ;
Adachi, Y ;
Kitano, S .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2006, 37 (03) :247-251