Dissociated Response in Metastatic Cancer: An Atypical Pattern Brought Into the Spotlight With Immunotherapy

被引:57
作者
Humbert, Olivier [1 ,2 ]
Chardin, David [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cote dAzur, Ctr Antoine Lacassagne, Dept Nucl Med, Nice, France
[2] Univ Cote dAzur, TIRO UMR E 4320, Nice, France
关键词
dissociated; response; immunotherapy; metastatic cancer; heterogeneous response; imaging; GENETIC-HETEROGENEITY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; SYSTEMIC THERAPY; BREAST-CANCER; CRITERIA; RECIST; PET/CT;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2020.566297
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
When evaluating metastatic tumor response to systemic therapies, dissociated response is defined as the coexistence of responding and non-responding lesions within the same patient. Although commonly observed on interim whole-body imaging, the current response criteria in solid cancer do not consider this evolutive pattern, which is, by default, assimilated to progression. With targeted therapies and chemotherapies, dissociated response is observed with different frequencies, depending on the primary cancer type, treatment, and imaging modality. Because FDG PET/CT can easily assess response on a lesion-by-lesion basis, thus quickly revealing response heterogeneity, a PET/CT dissociated response has been described in up to 48% of women treated for a metastatic breast cancer. Although some studies have underlined a specific prognostic of dissociated response, it has always ended up being described as an unfavorable prognostic pattern and therefore assimilated to the "Progressive Disease" category of RECIST/PERCIST. This dichotomous imaging report (response vs. progression) provides a simple information for clinical decision-support, which probably explains the relatively low consideration for the dissociated response pattern to chemotherapies and targeted therapies until now. With immune checkpoint inhibitors, this paradigm is quickly changing. Dissociated response is observed in around 10% of advanced lung cancer patients and appears to be associated to treatment efficiency. Indeed, for this subset of patients, a clinical benefit of immunotherapy and favorable prognosis are usually observed. This specific pattern should therefore be considered in the future immunotherapy-adapted criteria for response evaluation using CT and PET/CT, and specific clinical managements should be evaluated for this response pattern.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Evaluating response to immunotherapy with 18F-FDG PET/CT: where do we stand? [J].
Aide, Nicolas ;
De Pontdeville, Michel ;
Lopci, Egesta .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING, 2020, 47 (05) :1019-1021
[2]   The causes and consequences of genetic heterogeneity in cancer evolution [J].
Burrell, Rebecca A. ;
McGranahan, Nicholas ;
Bartek, Jiri ;
Swanton, Charles .
NATURE, 2013, 501 (7467) :338-345
[3]   18F-labelled fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) heterogeneity of response is prognostic in dabrafenib treated BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma [J].
Carlino, Matteo S. ;
Saunders, Catherine A. B. ;
Haydu, Lauren E. ;
Menzies, Alexander M. ;
Curtis, C. Martin, Jr. ;
Lebowitz, Peter F. ;
Kefford, Richard F. ;
Long, Georgina V. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2013, 49 (02) :395-402
[4]   Immunotherapy and the Role of Imaging [J].
Carter, Brett W. ;
Bhosale, Priya R. ;
Yang, Wei T. .
CANCER, 2018, 124 (14) :2906-2922
[5]   Pitfalls of a Mixed Metabolic Response at PET/CT [J].
Clark, Michael S. ;
Packard, Ann T. ;
Johnson, Derek R. ;
Johnson, Geoff B. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2019, 39 (05) :1461-1475
[6]   Clinical features of metastatic bone disease and risk of skeletal morbidity [J].
Coleman, Robert E. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2006, 12 (20) :6243S-6249S
[7]   Mixed Responses to Systemic Therapy Revealed Potential Genetic Heterogeneity and Poor Survival in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer [J].
Dong, Zhong-Yi ;
Zhai, Hao-Ran ;
Hou, Qing-Yi ;
Su, Jian ;
Liu, Si-Yang ;
Yan, Hong-Hong ;
Li, Yang-Si ;
Chen, Zhi-Yong ;
Zhong, Wen-Zhao ;
Wu, Yi-Long .
ONCOLOGIST, 2017, 22 (01) :61-69
[8]   New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) [J].
Eisenhauer, E. A. ;
Therasse, P. ;
Bogaerts, J. ;
Schwartz, L. H. ;
Sargent, D. ;
Ford, R. ;
Dancey, J. ;
Arbuck, S. ;
Gwyther, S. ;
Mooney, M. ;
Rubinstein, L. ;
Shankar, L. ;
Dodd, L. ;
Kaplan, R. ;
Lacombe, D. ;
Verweij, J. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2009, 45 (02) :228-247
[9]   Nivolumab for Recurrent Squamous-Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck [J].
Ferris, R. L. ;
Blumenschein, G., Jr. ;
Fayette, J. ;
Guigay, J. ;
Colevas, A. D. ;
Licitra, L. ;
Harrington, K. ;
Kasper, S. ;
Vokes, E. E. ;
Even, C. ;
Worden, F. ;
Saba, N. F. ;
Iglesias Docampo, L. C. ;
Haddad, R. ;
Rordorf, T. ;
Kiyota, N. ;
Tahara, M. ;
Monga, M. ;
Lynch, M. ;
Geese, W. J. ;
Kopit, J. ;
Shaw, J. W. ;
Gillison, M. L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (19) :1856-1867
[10]   Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer [J].
Hamaoka, T ;
Madewell, JE ;
Podoloff, DA ;
Hortobagyi, GN ;
Ueno, NT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2004, 22 (14) :2942-2953