Validation of single-step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality

被引:39
作者
Bermann, Matias [1 ]
Legarra, Andres [2 ]
Hollifield, Mary Kate [1 ]
Masuda, Yutaka [1 ]
Lourenco, Daniela [1 ]
Misztal, Ignacy [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Anim & Dairy Sci, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] INRA Toulouse, UMR GenPhySE, Castanet Tolosan, France
关键词
accuracy; binary trait; categorical trait; validation of genomic models; GENETIC EVALUATION; DAIRY-CATTLE; INFORMATION; SELECTION; VARIANCE; FEMALES;
D O I
10.1111/jbg.12507
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The objective of this study was to determine whether the linear regression (LR) method could be used to validate genomic threshold models. Statistics for the LR method were computed from estimated breeding values (EBVs) using the whole and truncated data sets with variances from the reference and validation populations. The method was tested using simulated and real chicken data sets. The simulated data set included 10 generations of 4,500 birds each; genotypes were available for the last three generations. Each animal was assigned a continuous trait, which was converted to a binary score assuming an incidence of failure of 7%. The real data set included the survival status of 186,596 broilers (mortality rate equal to 7.2%) and genotypes of 18,047 birds. Both data sets were analysed using best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) or single-step GBLUP (ssGBLUP). The whole data set included all phenotypes available, whereas in the partial data set, phenotypes of the most recent generation were removed. In the simulated data set, the accuracies based on the LR formulas were 0.45 for BLUP and 0.76 for ssGBLUP, whereas the correlations between true breeding values and EBVs (i.e. true accuracies) were 0.37 and 0.65, respectively. The gain in accuracy by adding genomic information was overestimated by 0.09 when using the LR method compared to the true increase in accuracy. However, when the estimated ratio between the additive variance computed based on pedigree only and on pedigree and genomic information was considered, the difference between true and estimated gain was <0.02. Accuracies of BLUP and ssGBLUP with the real data set were 0.41 and 0.47, respectively. This small improvement in accuracy when using ssGBLUP with the real data set was due to population structure and lower heritability. The LR method is a useful tool for estimating improvements in accuracy of EBVs due to the inclusion of genomic information when traditional validation methods ask-fold validation and predictive ability are not applicable.
引用
收藏
页码:4 / 13
页数:10
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score [J].
Aguilar, I. ;
Misztal, I. ;
Johnson, D. L. ;
Legarra, A. ;
Tsuruta, S. ;
Lawlor, T. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2010, 93 (02) :743-752
[2]   Development of genomic predictions for harvest and carcass weight in channel catfish [J].
Garcia, Andre L. S. ;
Bosworth, Brian ;
Waldbieser, Geoffrey ;
Misztal, Ignacy ;
Tsuruta, Shogo ;
Lourenco, Daniela A. L. .
GENETICS SELECTION EVOLUTION, 2018, 50
[3]  
GIANOLA D, 1983, GENET SEL EVOL, V15, P201, DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-15-2-201
[4]   Cross-Validation Without Doing Cross-Validation in Genome-Enabled Prediction [J].
Gianola, Daniel ;
Schoen, Chris-Carolin .
G3-GENES GENOMES GENETICS, 2016, 6 (10) :3107-3128
[5]  
Gnedenko B.V., 1978, The Theory of Probability, V4th
[6]   A MIXED-MODEL PROCEDURE FOR ANALYZING ORDERED CATEGORICAL-DATA [J].
HARVILLE, DA ;
MEE, RW .
BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (02) :393-408
[7]  
Henderson C., 1982, Proceedings of the world congress on sheep and beef cattle breeding
[8]   THE ESTIMATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL AND GENETIC TRENDS FROM RECORDS SUBJECT TO CULLING [J].
HENDERSON, CR ;
KEMPTHORNE, O ;
SEARLE, SR ;
VONKROSIGK, CM .
BIOMETRICS, 1959, 15 (02) :192-218
[9]  
HOTELLING H, 1953, J R STAT SOC B, V15, P193
[10]  
Huang C, 2006, J ANIM SCI, V84, P275