Sustainability of the blue water footprint of crops

被引:75
|
作者
Mekonnen, Mesfin M. [1 ,2 ]
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil Construct & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Univ Nebraska, Robert B Daugherty Water Food Global Inst, Lincoln, NE 68588 USA
[3] Univ Twente, Twente Water Ctr, POB 217, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Water footprint; Crop production; Efficient water use; Water savings; Water scarcity; GROUNDWATER DEPLETION; IRRIGATION; RESOURCES; GREEN; AVAILABILITY; AQUIFERS; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103679
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Agriculture is the largest water user and the driving force behind global water stress. While several studies have already assessed global green and blue water use in crop production at high spatial resolution, few studies have explicitly linked water scarcity to water use in the production of individual crops and assessed the sustainability of each crop production. We provide a detailed assessment of the sustainability and efficiency of the blue water use in global crop production. The study shows that 57% of the global blue WF is unsustainable. Close to 70% of the unsustainable portion of global blue WF is due to the production of five crops: wheat (27%), rice (17%), cotton (10%), sugarcane (8%), and fodder (7%). These crops have large unsustainable blue WF fraction ranging from 43% for rice to 68% for wheat. Countries with a significant proportion of unsustainable blue WF associated with crop production are primarily found in the Middle East and Central Asia. Qatar is at the top of the list, with about 71% of its blue WF being unsustainable, followed by Uzbekistan (68%), Pakistan (68%), and Turkmenistan (67%). Approximately 25% of the blue water can be saved globally by reducing the crop-specific WF to benchmark level.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products
    Mekonnen, M. M.
    Hoekstra, A. Y.
    HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2011, 15 (05) : 1577 - 1600
  • [2] Water Footprint, Blue Water Scarcity, and Economic Water Productivity of Irrigated Crops in Peshawar Basin, Pakistan
    Khan, Tariq
    Nouri, Hamideh
    Booij, Martijn J.
    Hoekstra, Arjen Y.
    Khan, Hizbullah
    Ullah, Ihsan
    WATER, 2021, 13 (09)
  • [3] Water footprint: An effective tool for the challenge of water sustainability
    Vargas-Pineda, Oscar, I
    Trujillo-Gonzalez, Juan M.
    Torres-Mora, Marco A.
    INGENIERIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD, 2020, 22 (01):
  • [4] Water security assessment using blue and green water footprint concepts
    Veettil, Anoop Valiya
    Mishra, Ashok K.
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2016, 542 : 589 - 602
  • [5] Water footprint sustainability assessment for the chemical sector at the regional level
    Wang, Fang
    Wang, Siqi
    Li, Zhiwei
    You, Huixian
    Aviso, Kathleen B.
    Tan, Raymond R.
    Jia, Xiaoping
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2019, 142 : 69 - 77
  • [6] Beyond blue: An extended framework of blue water footprint accounting
    Fridman, Dor
    Biran, Noa
    Kissinger, Meidad
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 777
  • [7] Water Footprint of Crops on Rhodes Island
    Symeonidou, Stella
    Vagiona, Dimitra
    WATER, 2019, 11 (05)
  • [8] The water footprint of root and tuber crops
    Sunitha, S.
    Akash, A. U.
    Sheela, M. N.
    Kumar, J. Suresh
    ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2024, 26 (02) : 3021 - 3043
  • [9] Diversities and sustainability of dietary water footprint and virtual water flows in China
    Yan, Chenjian
    Li, Meng
    Zhuo, La
    Han, Ying
    Ji, Xiangxiang
    Wu, Pute
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2024, 444
  • [10] Assessing the sustainability in water use at the basin scale through water footprint indicators
    D'Ambrosio, Ersilia
    Gentile, Francesco
    De Girolamo, Anna Maria
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 244