Interpolation-based super-resolution land cover mapping

被引:72
作者
Ling, Feng [1 ]
Du, Yun [1 ]
Li, Xiaodong [1 ]
Li, Wenbo [2 ]
Xiao, Fei [1 ]
Zhang, Yihang [1 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Geodesy & Geophys, Key Lab Environm & Disaster Monitoring & Evaluat, Wuhan, Hubei Province, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Inst Intelligent Machines, Hefei, Anhui, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
REMOTELY-SENSED IMAGERY; HOPFIELD NEURAL-NETWORK; SPATIAL-RESOLUTION; SENSING IMAGERY; SUBPIXEL SCALE; WATERLINE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1080/2150704X.2013.781284
中图分类号
TP7 [遥感技术];
学科分类号
081102 ; 0816 ; 081602 ; 083002 ; 1404 ;
摘要
Super-resolution mapping (SRM) is a technique to produce a land cover map with finer spatial resolution by using fractional proportion images as input. A two-step SRM approach has been widely used. First, a fine-resolution indicator map is estimated for each class from the coarse-resolution fractional image. All indicator maps are then combined to create the final fine-resolution land cover map. In this letter, three popular interpolation methods, Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW), Spline and Kriging, as well as four indicator map combination strategies, including the maximal value strategy and the sequential assignment strategy with and without normalization, were assessed. Based on the application to two simulated images, the performance of all SRM algorithms was assessed. The results show that the two-step SRM approach can obtain smoother land cover maps than hard classification. An increase in zoom factor results in the appearance of numerous small patches and linear artefacts in the SRM results. The accuracies of Spline and Kriging are similar and are both higher than that of IDW. The maximal value strategy can generate a smoother land cover map than the sequential assignment strategy in most cases, and a normalizing indicator value has a mixed effect on the result.
引用
收藏
页码:629 / 638
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Issues of uncertainty in super-resolution mapping and their implications for the design of an inter-comparison study [J].
Atkinson, Peter M. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 30 (20) :5293-5308
[3]   Geostatistical solutions for super-resolution land cover mapping [J].
Boucher, Alexandre ;
Kyriakidis, Phaedon C. ;
Cronkite-Ratcliff, Collin .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 46 (01) :272-283
[4]   Super-resolution mapping of the waterline from remotely sensed data [J].
Foody, GM ;
Muslim, AM ;
Atkinson, PM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2005, 26 (24) :5381-5392
[5]  
Foody GM, 2002, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V68, P897
[6]   A super-resolution mapping method using local indicator variograms [J].
Jin, Huiran ;
Mountrakis, Giorgos ;
Li, Peijun .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2012, 33 (24) :7747-7773
[7]   Super-resolution mapping based on the supervised fuzzy c-means approach [J].
Li, Xiaodong ;
Ling, Feng ;
Du, Yun .
REMOTE SENSING LETTERS, 2012, 3 (06) :501-510
[8]   Using a sub-pixel mapping model to improve the accuracy of landscape pattern indices [J].
Li, Xiaodong ;
Du, Yun ;
Ling, Feng ;
Wu, Shengjun ;
Feng, Qi .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2011, 11 (05) :1160-1170
[9]   Waterline mapping at the subpixel scale from remote sensing imagery with high-resolution digital elevation models [J].
Ling, F. ;
Xiao, F. ;
Du, Y. ;
Xue, H. P. ;
Ren, X. Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2008, 29 (06) :1809-1815
[10]   Sub-pixel mapping of remotely sensed imagery with hybrid intra- and inter-pixel dependence [J].
Ling, Feng ;
Li, Xiaodong ;
Du, Yun ;
Xiao, Fei .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (01) :341-357