Estimating Causal Effects On Social Networks

被引:1
作者
Forastiere, Laura [1 ]
Mealli, Fabrizia [2 ]
Wu, Albert [3 ]
Airoldi, Edoardo M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Yale Univ, Yale Inst Network Sci, New Haven, CT 06520 USA
[2] Univ Florence, Dept Stat, Comp Sci, Applicat, Florence, Italy
[3] Harvard Univ, Dept Stat, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
来源
2018 IEEE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON DATA SCIENCE AND ADVANCED ANALYTICS (DSAA) | 2018年
关键词
Causal Inference; Interference; Spillovers; Bayesian Inference; Social Impact; PROPENSITY SCORE; INFERENCE; INTERFERENCE; UNITS; STATISTICS;
D O I
10.1109/DSAA.2018.00016
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In most real-world systems units are interconnected and can be represented as networks consisting of nodes and edges. For instance, in social systems individuals can have social ties, family or financial relationships. In settings where some units are exposed to a treatment and its effects spills over connected units, estimating both the direct effect of the treatment and spillover effects presents several challenges. First, assumptions on the way and the extent to which spillover effects occur along the observed network are required. Second, in observational studies, where the treatment assignment is not under the control of the investigator, confounding and homophily are potential threats to the identification and estimation of causal effects on networks. Here, we make two structural assumptions: i) neighborhood interference, which assumes interference to operate only through a function of the the immediate neighbors' treatments, ii) unconfoundedness of the individual and neighborhood treatment, which rules out the presence of unmeasured confounding variables, including those driving homophily. Under these assumptions we develop a new covariate-adjustment estimator for treatment and spillover effects in observational studies on networks. Estimation is based on a generalized propensity score that balances individual and neighborhood covariates across units under different levels of individual treatment and of exposure to neighbors' treatment. Adjustment for propensity score is performed using a penalized spline regression. Inference capitalizes on a three-step Bayesian procedure which allows taking into account the uncertainty in the propensity score estimation and avoiding model feedback. Finally, correlation of interacting units is taken into account using a community detection algorithm and incorporating random effects in the outcome model. All these sources of variability, including variability of treatment assignment, are accounted for in the posterior distribution of finite-sample causal estimands.
引用
收藏
页码:60 / 69
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Semiparametric Regression
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Applied Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference from Incomplete-Data Perspectives, DOI DOI 10.1002/0470090456.CH7
[3]   ESTIMATING AVERAGE CAUSAL EFFECTS UNDER GENERAL INTERFERENCE, WITH APPLICATION TO A SOCIAL NETWORK EXPERIMENT [J].
Aronow, Peter M. ;
Samii, Cyrus .
ANNALS OF APPLIED STATISTICS, 2017, 11 (04) :1912-1947
[4]   A General Method for Detecting Interference Between Units in Randomized Experiments [J].
Aronow, Peter M. .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 2012, 41 (01) :3-16
[5]  
ATHEY S., 2015, 21313 NBER
[6]   A Stata package for the application of semiparametric estimators of dose-response functions [J].
Bia, Michela ;
Flores, Carlos A. ;
Flores-Lagunes, Alfonso ;
Mattei, Alessandra .
STATA JOURNAL, 2014, 14 (03) :580-604
[7]   Reasoning about Interference Between Units: A General Framework [J].
Bowers, Jake ;
Fredrickson, Mark M. ;
Panagopoulos, Costas .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2013, 21 (01) :97-124
[8]  
DER VAN DER LAAN M. J, 2014, J CAUSAL INFERENCE, P2193
[9]  
Eckles Dean, 2014, ARXIV14047530
[10]  
FORASTIERE L., 2018, ARXIV160906245