Learning under signal-to-noise ratio uncertainty

被引:0
作者
Ilek, Alex [1 ]
机构
[1] Bank Israel, Div Res, IL-91007 Jerusalem, Israel
关键词
adaptive learning; endogenous gain; Kalman Filter; parameter misevaluation index; signal-to-noise ratio;
D O I
10.1515/snde-2012-0046
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The paper presents an alternative real time adaptive learning algorithm in the presence of signal-to-noise ratio uncertainty. The main innovation of this algorithm is that it uses a gain which is determined within the model: it continuously depends on the extent of misevaluation of parameters embedded in the forecast error. We show that in the presence of signal-to-noise ratio misevaluation, the usage of the proposed learning algorithm is a significant improvement on the Kalman Filter learning algorithm. In a full information case, the Kalman Filter learning algorithm is still the optimal tool.
引用
收藏
页码:47 / 83
页数:37
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]  
Ljung L., 1987, THEORY PRACTICE RECU
[12]   Recurrent hyperinflations and learning [J].
Marcet, A ;
Nicolini, JP .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2003, 93 (05) :1476-1498
[13]   CONVERGENCE OF LEAST-SQUARES LEARNING IN ENVIRONMENTS WITH HIDDEN STATE VARIABLES AND PRIVATE INFORMATION [J].
MARCET, A ;
SARGENT, TJ .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1989, 97 (06) :1306-1322
[14]   Role of the minimal state variable criterion in rational expectations models [J].
McCallum, BT .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 1999, 6 (04) :621-639
[15]   Output fluctuations in the United States: What has changed since the early 1980's? [J].
McConnell, MM ;
Perez-Quiros, G .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2000, 90 (05) :1464-1476
[16]  
Milani F., 2007, 8 ANN BANK FINL CEPR
[17]  
Romer C. D., 2002, S SPONS FED RES BANK
[18]  
SIMS CA, 1980, AM ECON REV, V70, P250
[19]   Were there regime switches in US monetary policy? [J].
Sims, CA ;
Zha, T .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2006, 96 (01) :54-81
[20]   Median unbiased estimation of coefficient variance in a time-varying parameter model [J].
Stock, JH ;
Watson, MW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 93 (441) :349-358