Anatomical location for waist circumference measurement in older adults; a preliminary study

被引:20
作者
Guerra, R. S. [1 ,2 ]
Amaral, T. F. [1 ,3 ]
Marques, E. A. [4 ]
Mota, J. [4 ]
Restivo, Ma. T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Porto, Fac Engn, UISPA IDMEC, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[2] Univ Porto, Fac Med, Dept Biochem, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[3] Univ Porto, Fac Nutr & Food Sci, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
[4] Univ Porto, Fac Sports, Res Ctr Phys Activ Hlth & Leisure, P-4200465 Oporto, Portugal
关键词
Waist circumference; Anatomical location for measurement; Abdominal fat mass; Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry; Older adults; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; ADIPOSE-TISSUE; INSULIN-RESISTANCE; BODY-COMPOSITION; VISCERAL FAT; WOMEN; OBESITY; RISK; ACCUMULATION; PREDICTION;
D O I
10.3305/nh.2012.27.5.5922
中图分类号
R15 [营养卫生、食品卫生]; TS201 [基础科学];
学科分类号
100403 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Different anatomical locations for measuring waist circumference are described in the literature but the best anatomical location for measuring waist circumference in older adults has yet to be established. Thus, an exploratory study was developed to examine which waist circumference best explains abdominal fat mass in older adults. Methods: Waist circumference was measured in the ten different anatomical locations from a sample of 51 older adults. The choice of which waist circumference measurement best associated with abdominal fat mass was evaluated with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurement of abdominal fat. Results: Mean waist circumference values varied from 81.9 (standard deviation (SD): 8.7) cm and 91.5 (SD: 11.2) cm for women and between 95.7 (SD: 8.2) cm and 101.5 (SD: 10.4) cm for men, according to the different anatomical locations. The coefficients of determination of the linear regression model varied from 0.545 to 0.698 (p < 0.001) and the standardised coefficients varied from 0.738 and 0.836 (p < 0.001). The anatomical landmark situated 2.5 cm above the umbilicus was the waist circumference measurement that associated best with abdominal fat mass measured by DXA. Conclusion: This exploratory study contributes to the recognition that the anatomical location where the waist circumference measurement is taken gives considerably different results. The waist circumference measurement 2.5 cm above the umbilicus was the best surrogate measure of abdominal fat in this older adult's sample.
引用
收藏
页码:1554 / 1561
页数:8
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Waist perimeter cutoff points and prediction of metabolic syndrome risk.: A study in a Mexican population
    Alonso, Ana Lucia
    Munguia-Miranda, Catarina
    Ramos-Ponce, David
    Hernandez-Saavedra, Daniel
    Kumate, Jesus
    Cruz, Miguel
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 39 (03) : 346 - 351
  • [2] [Anonymous], INT STANDARDS ANTHRO
  • [3] [Anonymous], OBESITY SILVER SPRIN
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, NUTR ASSESSMENT
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, DECL HELS ETH PRINC
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, Keep fit for life: Meeting the nutritional needs of older persons
  • [7] [Anonymous], PRACT GUID ID EV TRE
  • [8] Camhi Sarah M, 2008, Prev Chronic Dis, V5, pA115
  • [9] Hip axis length variation: its correlation with anthropometric measurements in women from three ethnic groups
    Clark, P.
    Tesoriero, L. J.
    Morton, D. J.
    Talavera, J. O.
    Karlamangla, A.
    Schneider, D. L.
    Wooten, W. J.
    Barrett-Connor, E.
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (09) : 1301 - 1306
  • [10] Fat-free mass and fat mass reference values by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) in a 20-80 year-old Italian population
    Coin, Alessandra
    Sergi, Giuseppe
    Minicuci, Nadia
    Giannini, Sandro
    Barbiero, Elisa
    Manzato, Enzo
    Pedrazzoni, Mario
    Minisola, Salvatore
    Rossini, Maurizio
    Del Puente, Antonio
    Zamboni, Mauro
    Inelmen, Emine Meral
    Enzi, Giuliano
    [J]. CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 27 (01) : 87 - 94