New Immunosuppressive Therapies and Surgical Complications After Renal Transplantation

被引:10
作者
Barba, J. [1 ]
Rosell, D. [1 ]
Rincon, A. [2 ]
Robles, J. E. [1 ]
Zudaire, J. [1 ]
Berian, J. M. [1 ]
Pascual, I. [1 ]
Errasti, P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Urol, Pamplona, Spain
[2] Santiago Apostol Hosp, Dept Urol, Vitoria, Spain
[3] Univ Navarra Clin, Dept Nephrol, Pamplona, Spain
关键词
WOUND-HEALING COMPLICATIONS; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; KIDNEY-TRANSPLANTATION; RISK-FACTORS; SIROLIMUS; CYCLOSPORINE; RECIPIENTS; SURVIVAL; LYMPHOCELE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.01.112
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. To analyze the association between the principal immunosuppressive drugs (mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibitors and mammalian target of rapamycin [mTOR] inhibitors) used in the routine management of kidney transplant patients and the development of postoperative surgical complications. Materials and Methods. We analyzed 415 kidney transplants, studying the influence of various immunosuppressive regimens on the main postoperative surgical complications. Results. The mean follow-up for the entire group was 72.8 months (+/- 54.2 SD). Patients treated with myeophonolate mofetil (MMF) and cyclosporine (n = 121) experienced a higher frequency of wound eventration odds ratio [OR], 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-23.5; P = .03) compared with azathioprine and cyclosporine (n = 71). Compared with transplant recipients treated with tacrolimus and MMF (n = 181), transplant recipients treated with cyclosporine and MMF (n = 121) had a significantly greater frequency of wound eventration (OR, 3.7; 95% CI, 1.5-9.5; P = .005), urologic (OR, 2; 95% CI; 1.02-3.9; P = .04), wound (OR; 2.2; 95% CI; 1.07-4.6; P = .03), late (OR, 1.7; 95% CI; 1.01-3.03; P = .04), and Clavien grade 3 surgical complications (OR; 1.9; 95% CI, 1.1-3.37; P = .01). Patients treated with mTOR inhibitors (n = 26) had higher rates of lymphocele (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, (1.1-11.4; P = .002) compared with those who received tacrolimus (n = 197). Conclusions. New immunosuppressive drugs have improved short-term functional results; however, in some cases they seem to increase surgical complications rates.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1280
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Immediate renal Doppler ultrasonography findings (<24 h) and its association with graft survival [J].
Barba, Javier ;
Rioja, Jorge ;
Enrique Robles, Jose ;
Rincon, Anibal ;
Rosell, David ;
Javier Zudaire, Juan ;
Maria Berian, Jose ;
Pascual, Ignacio ;
Benito, Alberto ;
Errasti, Pedro .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2011, 29 (04) :547-553
[2]   Post-kidney transplant surgical complications under new immunosuppressive regimens [J].
Burgos, F. J. ;
Pascual, J. ;
Quicios, C. ;
Marcen, R. ;
Fernandez, A. ;
Fando, L. Lopez ;
Ortuno, J. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (08) :2445-2447
[3]  
CLAVIEN PA, 1992, SURGERY, V111, P518
[4]   Wound-healing complications after kidney transplantation: A prospective, randomized comparison of sirolimus and tacrolimus [J].
Dean, PG ;
Lund, WJ ;
Larson, TS ;
Prieto, M ;
Nyberg, SL ;
Ishitani, MB ;
Kremers, WK ;
Stegall, MD .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 77 (10) :1555-1561
[5]   Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey [J].
Dindo, D ;
Demartines, N ;
Clavien, PA .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) :205-213
[6]   The impact of sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids on wound healing in 513 kidney-transplant recipients [J].
Flechner, SM ;
Zhou, LM ;
Derweesh, I ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Savas, K ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Modlin, CS ;
Krishnamurthi, V ;
Novick, A .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 76 (12) :1729-1734
[7]   The influence of various maintenance immunosuppressive drugs on lymphocele formation and treatment after kidney transplantation [J].
Goel, M ;
Flechner, SM ;
Zhou, LM ;
Mastroianni, B ;
Savas, K ;
Derweesh, I ;
Patel, P ;
Modlin, C ;
Goldfarb, D ;
Novick, AC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (05) :1788-1792
[8]   Risk factors for wound healing complications in sirolimus-treated renal transplant recipients [J].
Grim, S. A. ;
Slover, C. M. ;
Sankary, H. ;
Oberholzer, J. ;
Benedetti, E. ;
Clark, N. M. .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2006, 38 (10) :3520-3523
[9]   Are wound complications after a kidney transplant more common with modern immunosuppression? [J].
Humar, A ;
Ramcharan, T ;
Denny, R ;
Gillingham, KJ ;
Payne, WD ;
Matas, AJ .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2001, 72 (12) :1920-1923
[10]   Ureteral necrosis after kidney transplantation: Risk factors and impact on graft and patient survival [J].
Karam, G ;
Maillet, F ;
Parant, S ;
Soulillou, JP ;
Giral-Classe, M .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 78 (05) :725-729