Comparison of the effect of baclofen and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for the treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis

被引:12
作者
Shaygannejad, Vahid [1 ]
Janghorbani, Mohsen [2 ]
Vaezi, Atefeh [1 ]
Haghighi, Sepehr [1 ]
Golabchi, Khodayar [1 ]
Heshmatipour, Mojtaba [3 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Neurol, Sch Med, Esfahan, Iran
[2] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Epidemiol & Biostat, Sch Publ Hlth, Esfahan, Iran
[3] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Sch Rehabil, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
Baclofen; Efficacy; Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation; Muscle spasticity; Modified Ashworth scale; Multiple sclerosis; Clinical trial; SPINAL SPASTICITY; TENS; REFLEX; MANAGEMENT; PROTOCOLS;
D O I
10.1179/1743132813Y.0000000200
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of baclofen and self-applied transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) for the treatment of spasticity in the lower extremities in multiple sclerosis (MS). Methods: A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted from September 2010 to June 2011. Fifty-two patients with MS presenting muscle spasm in the leg at 20-50 years of age were randomly allocated to receive a four-week treatment course of either baclofen (10 mg twice daily, increasing over three weeks to 25 mg) or self-applied TENS. Response to treatment was assessed at four weeks after commencement of the intervention by modified Ashworth scale (MAS). Results: Spasticity decreased in both groups. Of the 26 people treated with TENS, the mean (standard deviation (SD)) MAS decreased from 1.77 (0.29) at baseline to 0.73 (0.70) at the four-week follow-up (P, 0.001). Correspondingly, in the 26 people treated with baclofen, the mean (SD) MAS decreased from 1.73 (0.38) to 1.15 (0.63) (P < 0.001). The mean difference in MAS score at the four-week follow-up was significantly lower in the TENS group than the baclofen group (mean difference -0.42; 95% CI, -0.79, -0.05; P < 0.05). Discussion: This study demonstrates that both baclofen and TENS can be effective in reducing MS-related spasticity. The mean MAS score was significantly lower in the TENS group. However given the side-effect profile of baclofen, TENS may have some benefits over baclofen.
引用
收藏
页码:636 / 641
页数:6
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [21] PAIN MECHANISMS - A NEW THEORY
    MELZACK, R
    WALL, PD
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1965, 150 (3699) : 971 - +
  • [22] The effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on spasticity in multiple sclerosis
    Miller, L.
    Mattison, P.
    Paul, L.
    Wood, L.
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2007, 13 (04) : 527 - 533
  • [23] NEW DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA FOR MULTIPLE-SCLEROSIS - GUIDELINES FOR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS
    POSER, CM
    PATY, DW
    SCHEINBERG, L
    MCDONALD, WI
    DAVIS, FA
    EBERS, GC
    JOHNSON, KP
    SIBLEY, WA
    SILBERBERG, DH
    TOURTELLOTTE, WW
    [J]. ANNALS OF NEUROLOGY, 1983, 13 (03) : 227 - 231
  • [24] Clinical assessment and management of spasticity: a review
    Rekand, T.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 122 : 62 - 66
  • [25] TREATMENT OF SPASTICITY RELATED TO MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS WITH INTRATHECAL BACLOFEN: A LONG-TERM FOLLOW-UP
    Rekand, Tiina
    Gronning, Marit
    [J]. JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2011, 43 (06) : 511 - 514
  • [26] Prevalence and treatment of spasticity reported by multiple sclerosis patients
    Rizzo, MA
    Hadjimichael, OC
    Preiningerova, J
    Vollmer, TL
    [J]. MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, 2004, 10 (05): : 589 - 595
  • [27] Robinson I, 1990, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS A, P1
  • [28] SAWA GM, 1979, CAN J NEUROL SCI, V6, P351, DOI 10.1017/S0317167100023994
  • [29] EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE OF BIAS - DIMENSIONS OF METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATES OF TREATMENT EFFECTS IN CONTROLLED TRIALS
    SCHULZ, KF
    CHALMERS, I
    HAYES, RJ
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (05): : 408 - 412
  • [30] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation: Basic science mechanisms and clinical effectiveness
    Sluka, KA
    Walsh, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2003, 4 (03) : 109 - 121